RE: Back in favour31 Jan 2025 15:39
Thats just a load of waffle. Being decisive in opinion? So is that a yes or no pokerchips? lets see you being decisive in opinion. Will this decisiveness in opinion lead to decisiveness in action? Its kind of a lose-lose question for you really. If you answer yes, you will make yourself look really stupid because we all know it is never ever going to happen....if you said no then your arguements in favor of this government become worthless and contradictory.
You dont need to go any further than the USA to see what happens when a cat is put amongst the pigeons. Trump has achieved more in 4 days than that dope biden achieved in 4 years!
"At the moment they use more soundbites and fairytale promises than all the other parties put together ...but yes..it can all sound appealing at a time of political desperation..in terms of looking for answers and solutions"
I love the 1930s germany undertone. You liberals and your nazzi innuendo. What is it with you lot and comparing everything to the 3rd reich?? Trump was exactly what America and the western world needed! And farage will breath of fresh air amongst those who can only be decisive in opinion, but not in action! We can only hope trump can wobble starmers head. Imagine an american politician coming back from the grave even 50 years ago and seeing the headlines "America only recognises two sexes, Male and Female".
Aubery:
You give liberals an inch and provide them a platform for their agenda, they will try to take over the world with it. Thought experiment: If you allow people to call themselves a tree and give them a platform, by god they would, and they will begin tovpush their treeist agenda on every walk of society by any means possible. And before you know it, charities and "rights groups" start to appear, advocating tree rights and silencing anyonone against the treeist movement. Then their roots spread to governments, which force societies against their will to change...and they do change. They forgot that a tree is a tree and a human is a human and are afraid against daring to say such thing.
Then trump comes along. Wants to chop down the trees, pull the roots out and disinfect everyone who has been essentially brainwashed. Outcries of tree rights/charities/other movements call him nazzi scum for daring this, and is portrayed as the evil monster against free speech. The trees start rioting, calling for their identities to become protected, sue and slander anybody who dares say otherwise.
Philosophical debate: Who is the antagonist in this? who is thie protagonist? Who is the hero? Whats the moral of the story here?