RE: Stop8 Jan 2025 17:05
Sorry pokerchips...disagree on pretty much everything. Starmer is not realist, all his policies are ideological.
How many times have "big bets" been made by past labour governments regarding increasing taxation and borrowing to "improve" public services, for them to only be made worse, less efficient and even more cash hungry.
Public services in the UK are monsterous black holes, inefficient and care more about ideologies and wokeness than practicality and realism. Example: TFL, though not state run...it may as well be as they constantly cry about being on the brink, with begging bowl in hand to public funds pretty much on a monthly basis and with horrendous service records yet they find Β£6m to name a few overground lines the most incredulous woke names imaginable with the help of that tool of a mayor who couldnt run the finances of a p1ss up in a brewery.
No matter how much cash you throw at public services, it will never be enough and will never get better....it will just get bigger, ever more hungry and more wasteful! The only solution is a massive efficiency campaign. Bonfire the bs mid management/consultant roles costing the NHS billions. Allow it to cannibalise itself to become more efficient and resourceful! Even ideas like massive subsidies of gym memberships and fruit/veg, or state gyms for those who are obese and go to the doctors/hospital every week clogging up the system with ailments single handedly caused by their obesity and lifestyle choices would net massive savings. Sometimes, it just has to be called what it is. Diagnosis: You are fat. Prognosis: Being too fat. Prescription: Gym membership. Thats what i call realist and practical! None of this mental health, body shaming, woke bs. You give someone an inch, they will always go for the mile. Sometimes a fatty needs to be called fat. Same as public services; they are too fat, and need to be put on a tough diet to improve their health! Not fed more.
Personally, i would go as far as questioning whether the NHS in its current form is compatible with UK's economic interests going forward, and whether it will or can exist in the next 30-50 years as it currently is as it is becoming too costly. Europe's social welfare/bloated public services is why the US is pulling away from us at an alarming rate. And what does Europe have to show for all this waste? F all other than being poorer with the same gaping wealth divide. Europes experiment with centralisation, woke ideology and beaurocratic nonsense has failed. I predict a total breakup of the EU within 20 yrs and a massive overcorrection to rightwing policies right across europe.