RE: NPV4 Jan 2021 10:02
cossy
My calculation is the bluntest of instruments. It takes into account no project specific factors, its merely a rough guide Wendy Durham suggested you could use to get to rough figure without all the hard work, knowledge and effort that goes into RLs calculations.
The copper adds a significant amount to the bottom line but I would get too fixated on the detail using the method I've suggested. At best its +/- 25%. Having said that its a calculation that's been remarkably accurate on other investments and wildly inaccurate on others.
Most of RLs posts come with the caveat "subject to" and most of the "subject to" issues are holes in RY's presentations. As JPK suggests, the TEO should, hopefully, clear up a lot of the unknowns. Once we have a clearer picture, if that day ever dawns, we'll be, or at least RL will be, in a better position to clarify where this all might go.
TDT