Member Info for Tricky_Dicky

Cookies or otherwise, targeted advertising will never go away.
Google state: "Today, we're making explicit that once third-party cookies are phased out, we will not build [alternative] identifiers to track individuals as they browse across the web, nor will we use them in our products,".
This is nonsense of course as Google's revenues depends heavily on advertising.
They are playing with words.
Google have many other identifiers already, as does CTV.

baldy,

Never did I say Cornwallian was an archaic term.
But the Cornish would laugh at Cornwallian and the Welsh at Welshian.
That's twice you have been 'teasy' with me lately.
We'll be going steady soon!

Don't we see it here just the same?

The best conversation he ever had was over forty million years ago…. And that was with a coffee machine.

baldy,

The Cornish people rather dislike the term 'Cornwallian'.
Perhaps because it reminds them of the term 'Cromwellian'.
They were Royalist, you see, and hated Oliver Cromwell invading personally.
As the Parliamentarian commander O.C. and 1,500 of his soldiers, descended onto Wadebridge
in March of 1646.
Cornwall played a significant role in the war, being a Royalist enclave in the generally Parliamentarian south-west.
The Duchy of Cornwall and Cornwall’s Stannary Parliament were strongly connected with the royal family. They gave Cornwall a sense of independence, which was threatened by Parliament.
Stannary Courts presided over tin-mining districts - Stannum being the Latin word for tin.
Tin is found in cassiterite, and has several allotropes.

from baldy,
'Tricky, you don't know your history as well as I thought you did. Not like you to ask someone to 'dumb down'.

What was that about?

baldy I agree,

Hence the colony aphorism!

stt1 has zero understanding of the meaning of research.
What is his hypothesis?
Running around all over the place with bits and bobs of old data
Doesn't know the industry and stabs at anyone who challenges him.
Desperate to rock the boat by cobbling together lots of fragmented and biased evidence.
It does not add up to research by any measure.

He thinks he is addressing a colony for the mentally defective.

Not even a date available yet.
Don't tell our star-gazer - by the magic of astral planes he has read everything already!

'Teasy' is Cornish for annoyed, irritated, tetchy,

baldy,
Cornwallian
Perhaps in the times of Oliver Cromwell.
Now don't you be getting 'teasy' with me!

to sst1,

You keep posting links to the results from 2019, sadly confusing them with 2020.
Telling me I can post a link to the 2020 results myself.
I am not a time-traveler.
Are you star-gazing?

Cornwallians??

I really do not have the time to keep correcting your mistakes, stt1.
2020 was well ahead of expectations, 2019 was much better than 2018.
- it's all there in black and white!
As Expected!

stt1,

Who are you kidding?
The PDF you posted is a link to 2019 which shows a 37% better (ebitda ) than 2018.

A Nasdaq listing may or not be a good thing.
A small fish in a big pond?

From stt1:

'The figures speak for themselves. Trmr has risen on the back of the interest in tech in USA'.

Not true, they have recently increased on the back of increased profits.
Plus, I can't agree with your figures, the link you posted as a pdf shows Adjusted EBITDA* increased 37% to $60.4 million in 2019.
(2018:$44.1 million).
I can agree that cash reserves are increasing and this is quite healthy.

The calculating sociopath won't stop.
After all, it's all just a game and the people are pawns.

A most refreshing and insightful post - SP180,
Of course there are challenges in every business/industry, we can all agree on that, to only highlight them negatively without considering the positives indicates an imbalance, this is where we are with stt1.
The ad tech ecosystem is such a huge and complex field that it takes some effort to understand the workings and the scenarios.
Partly because ad tech is changing so rapidly, as new communication technology develops and spreads, and also because the inner mechanisms are obscured by terms that often just have three letters to unravel.
SSP, DSP, DMP, CTV, VOD, and many more.
Even if you can understand each abbreviation it is difficult to work out which company operates the better solution now and is planning future systems that will cope better with changes in the ecosystem to come.
We have transmission technology, advertising business models, and then the workings of the markets to consider.
Also acquisitions and expansion abroad.
No investor and no company can have certainty in the light of the above, therefore we remain cautious but reasonably optimistic since huge opportunities are out there for the taking.
If stt1 doesn't like it he can clear off!