Member Info for Tricky_Dicky

Revenues increasing from Unruly and R1 - good point.
PMP 's up over 1200% - fantastic.
Self-serve platform up over 600% - brilliant.
Increased cash reserves - excellent.
Huge amounts of shares in treasury - wonderful.
Something good is happening - with much more to come!

Bubble-boy has been hard at it, shorting here for years 'cause it's a volatile stock.
His 'analysis' is like a bad cookie that follows us around forever with a sell message:

Management bad - sell
business model bad - sell
bubble in adtech - sell
CEO sold some - sell
Methbot - sell
Fraud - sell
huge increase in debt - sell
lack of transparency - sell
court case sell
cookie issues - sell
negative news-flow - sell
no U.S. election now - sell
Missed Finncap's expectations - sell

A shorter, pure and simple!

Technology keeps evolving and providing new opportunities.
There is regulation everywhere and some of it is to stop huge companies
from twisting regulations to gain competitive advantage.

from stt1:
'BBs are better when posters post about company/sector newsflow and let readers form their own opinion.'.

We do not see a balanced view from stt1 ever.
He is all over the place like a rash.
Everything he posts is aimed at condemning Tremor by association.
Or by following the wrong business model.
Or almost anything else he wishes to imagine.

He repeats posts ad-infinitum to push his negative interpretations across.
A sociopath spammer with an addiction.
Posts negativity to let the readers form their own opinion - not likely!

What do you mean pottery?
That stt1is a basket-case?

dumblebee and stt1 clearly fail to understand the difference between sick care and health care.
I can see that Totally mop up certain opportunities in NHS bottlenecks.
Do they really help the NHS reduce waiting times for emergency services?
I have never invested in TLY and just want to see what they do better than the NHS.
Why it is so profitable and why does asking questions about the case for private support attract such
poor language and nasty attitudes?
Come on guys, abuse is not right, it's not big or clever.

stt1 is there with his hat on only if he thinks he has found an opportunity to show negative news-flow.
It is unbalanced and therefore highly suspect.
That is not how scientists conduct research.
He states facts out of context hoping that people will believe they are good evidence.
This is not acceptable to anyone in a legal context either.
So what do we have here? Someone desperate to dismiss the ad tech sector as beset with so many issues that
make it very unattractive to invest in.
Preferring instead to make a case for a company in private healthcare (Totally) where creative accounting massages money away from the NHS and into the coffers of people seeking profits.

You have said that there was manipulation of the sp by management in the past.
That some companies are more transparent and therefore more successful.
That DSP or SSP alone is better than the 'full stack'.
Having to provide cash provision against bad debt is very worrying.
Industry challenges are very concerning.
Headwinds are blowing all about.
And a current bubble is the final nail in the coffin.

So, stt1,

You are you saying Blnx (renamed rthm, now merged with trmr) rose to £28 without an external market 'bubble' being involved.
Some time in the distant past and clearly in a different company.
And that you fully understand what £28 equates to in today's money?
And that an external market 'bubble' now is the cause of a pull-back in the U.S. that you predicted.
In that case the correction of an external 'bubble' in the U.S. is a of less significance than industry challenges.
Or is it caused by such challenges?
But what you have opined, internal machinations are much more powerful drivers of the sp (up or down).
Please clarify.

Our resident bubble-boy desperately hopes and wishes to have found a bubble.
Singing repeatedly about a bubble and cookies.
It's the meerkat!

Has the so-called ad-tech bubble been truly burst, for any number of suggested (negative) reasons?
Journalistic stories have been predicting an ad-tech bubble for at least ten years.
Is it not more accurate to say that the momentum of huge leaps forward has been corrected by minor falls.
This is the landscape we operate in.
Anyone can jump up and down and declare a bursting bubble.
It is called journalism, which is also an advertising mechanism, i.e. paid for.

It seems then that in areas such as making patients healthy is not where Totally has a vested interest.
That alone should tell a story.

Clegg is a fool, for suggesting that asking Facebook to pay money to news publishers is “like forcing car makers to fund radio stations because people might listen to them in the car – and letting the stations set the price”.
This simile conveniently ignores the fact that both Facebook and news publishers conduct exactly the same business: showing people content and selling advertising space around it.

It is mainly advances in medical science that help the NHS save lives .
Does 'Totally' have apart to play?

It's a bit archaic!

The poor old sod prefers to sink back.
Never looking on the bright side.
Down he goes, to the bottom of his pond.

Third-party cookies are not illegal.
Currently only the browsers ask for consent.
The industry, i.e. Google may soon phase them out.
Maybe they are cynically addressing a genuine concern - but for sure they have business advantage at heart.

Taxpayers money will provide a 10-bagger?

Maybe not.

From THorn:

'Lets not get this personal
Totally are a strength and well welcomed by the NHS'

On what basis?

Be quiet you Pillock!