Member Info for travel_light

The carrier component is a bi-product of cleavage and has no observed effect from what he said.

"Maybe ice, but if a big money partner takes a 50% stake we just lost half of the profits."

but gained a big payment, so you don't lose half. You swap risk for capital which can be invested.

Guess some traders bought in, thinking the meeting was going to be fireworks and champers.

Instead they got AL who was the most animated I've seen him. Swear he even laughed. Does he have a twin ?

His face lit up when asked directly, do you think this will work given what you know.

He's a CEO, he is working in pharmaceuticals. He is only allowed to say so much. I am not a fan of his, but he didn't give his usual fluff. PK values, he won't be able to publish if he tells all now so well covered. His face and relaxed posture said a lot. So credit where credit due.

The traders hoping for a massive upswing, didn't get it, they are for a quick buck, and so go out. It's not that type of share, and neither was it that type of meeting.

Did anyone goto afternoon session. could you summarize please.

I couldn't find any link online, was it recorded.

Maybe dox locked up…..biopsy results icing on the cake.

He is teasing us.:-)

Give us the numbers AL!!

I think RH wanted to express an opinion. Odd way to do it, but hej ho.

cj62, geeze, so someone has sold, and was happy making 12%. Not a bad return.

Not as good as my 1000% is going to be, but do ya really need to goto the T*** word right away ?

moral high ground, I'm a saint, etc etc.

Just bought at 126, bargain.

I’ll be disappointed if we don’t get early insights into next season shumpers. Can someone make sure the AC is cracked right down.

I think these tumors are not normally treated with dox. The response verses toxic effects are not balanced in patients favor.

So that in 6k there has been any positive outcome without significant negative effects makes this a whole new ball game IMHO. The only idea was to look at conversion etc not treat.

be nice to have more details, hopefully not just spin.

And apologies for answering when someone else asked.

Like Point Bio ?

Point bio also have something cooking, trade marked CanSeek

https://www.pointbiopharma.com/press-releases/early-stage-program-updates

:-)

yeah, if there was only something that could be done about that safety profile. no one believes it, it's way to good, I mean, if it was true it would be 200 exc china just round the corner. wiser heads than mine see the flaw, and adjust SP accordingly, I mean when have they ever been wrong.

Im just going to live the dream, and pretend the numbers point to something quite cool ahead for patients and investors. im happy.

Yeah, I didn't like to ask, in case I got called some nasty names again.

If a regime was keeping a patient alive, why would a doctor then stop dosing. Is that what a dosing holiday is ?

Thought if anything, any change would be for the regime to increase dosage or make it more frequent, not less due to good safety profile.

PL that would be awesome (patient image data at AGM).

Thanks

So, excuse my ignorance, p1b is to compare exiting treatment and see if 6K is better in controlled fashion. Both sets are being treated.

If 6K is shown to be better during trial are all patients moved? Maybe wishful thinking.

For 1a someone said patients would not be moved cos data is being collected and it would be dirty. That’s kinda harsh. I would have hoped docs could move patients to a better regime. I’m sure many of us would want them and their families rather than a nice graph.

I think there will be lots of good news. If you don’t have shares, go buy some. Could really fly in next 1-3 years IMHO.

Who said in 2020

"I look forward to updating the market on progress over the coming months."

good news flow, is not the same as “I anticipate meaningful revenue soon”.

I hope they come quickly, maybe a deal is in the pipe, but “significant news flow across the group” doesn’t give us any other information above that we all ready how. But love the optimism.

I read it as “don’t listen to (o) on the internet”.

Would aC1 patient being dosed higher “dirty the data”

You would need to include the data to start with, it could be kept separate. The C1 data has been collected. Seems macabre you keep them on that dosage just to see what happens or to keep a graph clean.

Also is PK data for a subsequent dosage affected by earlier dosage?

If it is, doe upping the dose provide useful data.

Not progressing… what of illness has progressed but has been slowed? Should those individuals get higher dosage.

Trial permissions, anyone know what praxis is?

Wait till the yanks wake up

Shoot I had pages more. I was cut off in full flow, which for someone my age is no joke.

I dance almost as well as I type.

Hi Mr Ripley,

Hope you had a nice day too.

Thanks for the feedback. Scatting ? Is that like Scatman John ? https://youtu.be/Hy8kmNEo1i8

That would be awesome, as a man of literary incompetence, which I freely admit, I’d love to do that. I’m trying to figure out if it was meant to be an insult. Have to admit my typing is shocking, fair play. Bloody small screen on an iphone.

Not sure I created a thread ripping anyone ? Do you mean thread Dosage. Others pointed out my poorly phrased question is one many have. All I asked was that the Dutch Riders , would let someone answer rather than throwing insults. You had some difficulty with that and maybe I gave back with a little too much gusto which you didn’t deserve. My bad, sorry. Hard to change gear when Micky, Rowboat and Popsicle are around thro.

Thanks Timster, great link. Mountain Biking, took me a while to get, made me chuckle.

To quote you Mr R, you seem to think I am concerned about people being positive. Don’t think I have mentioned that anywhere.

I can understand you are very busy, so to help you, here is what happened. Just for politeness sake.