Member Info for Toukankahmoon

Welsh falcon

Why do you and other rampers spread such rubbish to support your hysterical fervour for Avacta?

===================================

In the UK, auditors are required to assess whether a company is a "going concern" when signing off on its financial statements. The term "going concern" refers to the assumption that a company will continue its operations for the foreseeable future, without the intention or necessity of liquidation or ceasing trading.

INVESTOPEDIA.COM

The auditing standard governing this assessment is ISA (UK) 570, issued by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC). This standard mandates that auditors evaluate management's use of the going concern assumption in preparing financial statements and determine whether any material uncertainties exist that could cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.

FRC.ORG.UK

Auditors are expected to:

Critically assess the company's financial health, including cash flows, debt levels, and profitability.

Consider external factors such as market conditions, economic trends, and regulatory changes that might impact the company's operations.

Evaluate management's plans to address potential financial difficulties and their feasibility.

If auditors identify material uncertainties related to the company's ability to continue as a going concern, these must be disclosed in the financial statements. Such disclosures inform stakeholders of potential risks regarding the company's future viability.

ICAEW.COM

In summary, auditors in the UK must be satisfied that a company is a going concern when approving its financial statements. This involves a thorough evaluation of both internal financial metrics and external factors to ensure the company's continued operational viability.

===============

I’ve had to go and lie down. Icecool has posted something I actually agree with. 🤣🤣🤣

CC cannot present P1b results until they are available. So how is it her fault?

Tim

Funnily enough I was in White City not so long ago at an Imperial College alumnus meeting.

Ok. I give up.

Because it was expressing a personal opinion, it wasn’t a ramp even though you alluded to the fact it was.

You are so desperate to be right.

I unreservedly apologise. I was very wrong to accuse you of ramping. I admire your integrity and wish you success in your investment.

Peace and goodwill.

Apre

You allude to the fact that it’s a ramp yourself:

“And I'm not one for ramping but IMO only, I do feel confident that at this price there will be a profit showing pretty soon.”

And the definition of ludicrous is “so foolish, unreasonable, or out of place as to be amusing”. So given that you had no evidence to base your prediction on and it has proved completely wrong, I would say ludicrous ramp fits the bill.

Apre

After your words of wisdom at the last Retail Offer I think shares could be bought at around 9 p or so. Those shares can now be sold for 7.5 p. My point was that you had no facts to base your prediction on. That is why I picked up on it.

In my recent comment I just reminded you of this. BUT I also said that bearing in mind recent deals you could be right this time.

Why are you so sensitive?

Watching

Not me. TW doesn’t pay me for afternoon shifts.

I’m happy with CC’s timescales. The well researched seasoned investors have been telling us there’s a deal or T/O or more recently NASDAQ listing for what seems like years. The fact it hasn’t happened for fairly obvious reasons doesn’t seem to curb their wishful fantasies at all. And the naive on here treat them like prophets 🤣🤣🤣🤣

. . . oh and now he’s at it again:

=============================

Price: 8.25

No Opinion

RE: £800,000 UKRI Funding announced today27 Jan 2025 18:45

I'd like to echo the positive vibe. This is very prestigious recognition of a relatively small company and a real feather in the BOD's cap. The money is useful but the kudos is worth more and I am sure will be noted by peers in the industry and customers, existing and potential.

If only I had some spare cash to top up. Another incursion into the depths of the sofa might be in order.

=================

OK. I am finally fed up with this lunatic.

Apre posted this at the time of last year’s Retail Offer @ 9.75p. It was a blatant ramp not based on facts but on Apre’s wishful thinking. I called him out on it and of course the SP has fallen ever since. Apre cannot get over being wrong or the fact that I called him out.

END OF

================================

Posts: 1,502

Price: 10.00

No Opinion

RE: Retail offer

19 Aug 2024 17:16

Just got in from work, looked in, saw the shower of red dots and thought, this looks good. I've had a read through all the blurb and I'd say it looks more than good. Great to get confirmation of the retail offer details and at a very fair price. And some big hitters on board too.

IMHO excellent news all round, professionally and fairly handled and it seems to me like another of ABDX's long term plan ducks has just been squarely added to the row.

I'm only sorry I don't have a lot of spare cash to put in at the moment. I have chipped a finger nail fishing down the back of the couch but managed to come up with a few quid to take a little advantage of the offer. I've put my bid in already. And I'm not one for ramping but IMO only, I do feel confident that at this price there will be a profit showing pretty soon.

So I'm happy. Also, I expect the finger nail to be fine in a few days too . . .

=============================

. . . and the one thing that’s great about this BB is the occasional explanation or analysis based on facts not wishful predictions on what might happen next week.

So, thank you.

Buen

Sorry I wasn’t having a pot at you.

. . . and what imminent event do you think is going to trigger this deal?

Just asking

For a friend

Harrogate

I know what you are saying, but if you don’t write they certainly won’t read it😄

Buen

Yes yes yes

Leave me to “die” in peace🤣🤣🤣🤣

There are only so many times I can admit my mistake and apologise. Only so many times I can rejoice in the phenomenon that is AVA6103.

But at least I’ve given my (many) detractors a good laugh.

Have a great weekend.

The actual explanation was not given by CC but by one of the scientists and was along the lines of “because of the way the cancer cells divide in cycles it is possible that the intravenous injection of AVA6000 misses the cycle so that at the point of cell division AVA6000 level is extremely low.” The scientists among you will know that doxorubicin works by interfering with cell division.

Whoops a most grovelling apology. Senility has finally caught up with me.

But at least I am big enough to admit my stupid mistake.

In my excitement over yesterday’s great video I followed the link in Buenvista’s post in the thread “CONTINUED COMPLETE REGRESSIONS”. That link was to the “R&D Spotlight Live - October 2024” during which the comments regarding half life were made in the audio.

R&D Spotlight Live - October 2024

Don’t know how I missed them at the time given as you say my original interest in half life.

Going to crawl away under a stone for a while you’ll all be pleased to know. But of course misattributing the quote does not alter what was said at the time about half life shortcomings.

Ok

Key factors:

AVA6000 has too short a half life to ensure that there is enough in the bloodstream at the time cancer cells are dividing. Said in latest video or words to that effect

I seem to remember some of us mooting this point over a year ago and being shouted down.

No doubt someone will argue that wasn’t what CC actually said, but that was the point she was making and the reason for the modifications to produce AVA6103.

Well done rampers a truly educational and grown up post.