Member Info for TorquayFan

Cleaner good research as ever and thanks.

Re. "who shall make a wishy on a little fishy when the boat comes in "

It might be, 'who shall have a fishy on a little dishy, who shall have a fishy, when the boat comes in'. And it's booat up there.

I used to love that program on the Beeb.

As for Scancell - blue week coming - but I'm usually wrong.

A quiet BB today - in my case - exhaustion. But the science will see us through.

ATB

MMmmmm.

Cheers Matt. You surprise me about the science comment but I'll take it LOL
You hop and I'll hop too - let's see if the SP responds. ATB

Hello Matt - no offence intended. Good to see your opinion of course but for balance I appreciated the other posts too. Was I happy with the RNS? Not really - I was a bit disappointed but it's how it is, for now . . . .

Still optimistic AND impatient LOL. ATB

Johnny thanks for your 19.40 and for the caps added here - "...Scancell therefore used its proven cancer vaccine concept to DESIGN a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.” I think you may be right here, "The question I am asking myself is will Scancell sell the vaccine it has “designed” to big pharma?". Indeed - Scancell are signalling they have a development project, 'Covidity' on the shelf with fuller data available soon. If Scancell can, they will sell the project as it is? Let's hope a Buyer comes along!

EE it's great to see you posting here and your 09.13 insights to the precision needed in wording an RNS. I had to chuckle at this - "If retail investors on bulletin boards can possibly misunderstand something, then they will do so!" - (and I am as guilty of that as anyone else).

Enjoyed your 10.55 Ray and Bermuda's straightener to Matt R nicely done IMO.

A helpful but more sober BB yesterday. ATB

Thanks Burble - some reassurance. Lets see. ATB

Iofas the UK Govt. seems to have thrown its weight behind Moderna and mRNA vaccines the moment. It seems to have relevance to me. Im sure we would all like to see the Govt. throw its weight behind DNA vaccines instead. Perhaps Covidity if the data is good ! ATB

Ruck 12.34 - I can back you up there. No names no pack drill but these were the words passed to me - "his immune response is too low to start the trial."

Thanks WF. It was mouth cancer - lets hope for a different miracle for this Guy. ATB

Thanks WF. A good summary from CRUK. And it would be good to know how many of the hoped for 87 have been recruited now.

Yes Roses and if the price is high enough, I guess we will all be happy anyway.

To the matters of the timing of the interims, the apparent delayed release of the RG video, the demise of Zakari etc. I would add that the failure to appoint a new Chair after some months - to me thats the most significant oddity.

Perhaps JC has found himself integral to something proceeding behind the scenes OR a new Chair might not now be appropriate to developments under way? Who knows?

We will soon . . . ATB

Yes Roses but on the other hand, any Buyer will not want to take Scancell without Prof. Lindy staying around. So IMO Redmile, Vulpes etc. will not support any deal that does not keep her in close control. And again IMO, Prof. Lindy is still central to the project and I dont see Scancell going to anyone without her - and she knows what Scancells 4 platforms are worth, thats for sure.

WTP myself Im quite sure that Lindy will be around these projects for some considerable time yet - its her lifes work coming to fruition.

No apostrophes . . . .

Marcus thanks very much - great to see Richard relaxed and happy "in retirement" as he chats about Moditope, Scancells "golden nugget".

I hope you dont mind but Ill pop that over there right now. Thanks again.

Marcus thanks for that - I thought it was a brilliant interview mainly because RG was so relaxed and positive - his confidence seemed boundless. Well done for setting that up! ATB

Chester - I DO need a whisky. ATB.

Jackdaw you are out of touch - IMO LLass was posting about state of the art scans for cancer patients - re "Trish" the first Modi 1 who reported after the 2nd scan, a 55% reduction in the tumour in her throat - correct me if I am wrong. Current techniques are more and maybe highly accurate

As dealt with the RW post before hers. Keep in touch. ATB

WF - IMHO very good thinking - what happens if, as U2 said, "with or without you" is better, or even the same ? (CI wise) Fascinating and maybe a game changer.

Cleaner thanks - Inans post shows that Modernas weight is right behind these bivalents for boosters - a nice order book already by 10/1/23! My reply there to Inan :-

""Inan - "for those that cannot see a Universal Vaccine market ....... for a "high Avidity" Vaccine against Covid ...""

"Guessing that most see a massive market for that - the point is, will Covidity prove to be a candidate ? What do you think about Modernas bivalent vax - is it still appropriate for the variants around atm ?"

Just for interest. However surely Scancells science e.g. Modi, Avidimab and the Glycans would seem to me, to qualify for this header ? Our Profs work through DNA seems to disrupt an MRNA predominance of thought?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04577-5?

WTP 11.49 - yes MT was replying to my re. the Chair, "I can only surmise that either someone is interested but waiting for affirmation of progress before involving themselves OR that something lets say structural is around the corner."

I think MT and I are on a similar page and I have alluded to this a few times. Exciting times. ATB

It doesnt really matter but that last line crept in during the drafting.