Member Info for TorquayFan

Ruck 10.21 - "Move on. Please." Tried many times. The 'bitter' suits C7.
BTW - I was very surprised that you had Grandchildren, let alone of that age - thought you were a youngster. .

C7 your whining about ADVFN is hypocrisy - 1st order. Apart from your courting favour there when it suited you, it was also your practice at one time, to copy links/comments and so on. I don't know why you stopped. IMO the BB's are so fragmented now, it's helpful and for the record, I'll post just as I please.

Not to forget, your post to Ivy WAS disgraceful - no amount of waffle about me will change that. There are still some great Guys on this BB and I just don't know how you get such past them and past LSE Admin come to that.

GLA

Your post to Ivy was disgraceful - no amount of waffle about me will change that.

You posted : ''Think you are reading ADVFN too often, transferring the bile and venom to here, exactly as i say. If you mix with shite......'' (Then you say, ''I hold no grudges to anybody there at all'' LOL ).

That's people, fellow SCLP Posters, you are discussing as 'shite'. You should apologise. Why not ? BFN

Missed Inan off that list . . . . And sorry for the delayed 20.07 C7 - internet probs. BFN

Don't try to blame your previous choices re. ADVFN on others. Anyway, your position now, is much in contrast is it not? For myself, I want to see what Timbo, Gooosed, Bermuda, Ivy, ONW and many others have to say. And that's OK.

Your post to Ivy, who has now left us - ''Think you are reading ADVFN too often, transferring the bile and venom to here, exactly as i say. If you mix with shite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,''. 09.00 today - '' I hold no grudges to anybody there at all''. Really ?

Sorry C7 - your 09.00 was such a muddle, I had to reply. But that's my last for now.

Now where's that blue ? TCOY

Right on ! There's a bit of blue - 99.24 % to go !

I saw your 15.38 this morning when I woke up. I didn't pester you, I replied to yours. Am mindful 18 months ago, our Lion looked a bit brighter . . .

Now, let's hope the share can perform - like a LION indeed - love that one.

Hi Ruck. The answer to your ADVFN question is NO - (due to my using filters).

As for moving on - I was poked with this stick over some weeks before replying.

I share your wishes for a bit of blue C7. Let's start with 100 % ATB

Another dig 15.38 - ''I called the "share" a dog, and got hounded by TF for weeks''.
Yes I challenged that ! Were you right (then) or was I ?
You have doubled your holding since then have you not ?

That was around the time you claimed to be deserting this 'dreadful' BB to pal up with oddies on ADVFN. It's the content of your posts that drives my response - it's your bitterness that drives you.

Move on. Please.

Agree with that. Also Inan 12.34. Good stuff.

I thought 'not helpful' was fair enough. Moderate even. The matter had more or less rested had it not ? BFN

Re. David Evans and your 17.50, ''But why on earth would he bother?''

DE has a substantial shareholding. He might also feel it worth setting right some of the rough criticism about the BoD and some past events.

NXC has done that, since the first post, with consummate skill and grace and I believe most on the BB"s are very grateful for his efforts.

Your comments have not been helpful. ATB

Your 19.06 to Ivy is shocking - ''Think you are reading ADVFN too often, transferring the bile and venom to here, exactly as i say. If you mix with shite,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,''. When you post like that, we see just who you really are.

I guess you are tired after a marathon effort today - but really, I think you should apologise.

I see your 17.50. For the record, I always read this BB first.

May I remind you politely that it wasn't so long ago, that you yourself went to ADVFN bemoaning LSE as a 'dreadful' BB whilst trying to cosy up to some of the oddest characters around. I challenged you at the time about it.

Your hypocrisy is, as always, mindblowing.

Crikey two thanks in one day.
Left field China 'formally accepted' too ! And Japan . .
This can't be bad . . .
Thanks Konar.

Thanks.

OK, not an aversion - sorry.

But there's no vitriol if you go just to the posts of NXC himself.

And all from the inside track . . . ATB

Quote - CAR-T therapies have ''become hyped'' :-

''Managing patients’ expectations of CAR-T therapies is proving to be a huge challenge from when selection decisions are made, through the treatment process and when they are recovering at home, a conference heard. Speakers at Kisaco Research’s CAR-T Congress EU in London said that there is an increasing awareness about the therapies in patients with blood cancer. Indeed they have even become “hyped” and patient organisations and doctors are faced with challenging conversations with people with blood cancer, as CAR-T therapies are still only approved for a few very sick patients as a treatment of last resort.''

https://pharmaphorum.com/top-stories/doctors-and-patient-groups-struggle-with-car-t-hype/?

Crumbs - your 20.11 ? Re David Evans . . don't get it ?

C7 - despite your aversion, well worth reading the insights of NXC if you have the time.

Thanks Crumbs - I've been closely following your posts themed around TCR recently. You and the others make a very plausible case - (even though elsewhere they might mock the 'ramping team' - I don't see it that way at all).

The points you and others have developed, triggered by the recent appointments, particularly that of Dr Samantha Paston, really do hang together in a plausible way. You really could be right and let's hope we get some substantiation before too long.

Thanks for the insights and the optimism - it's appreciated, (however it all turns out).

Nice Sunday . . .

''Ivy makes it sound like you can swing round an oil tanker on a sixpence ....''

I suppose that would depend on how many tugboats you can afford to deploy.

G'night . .

CRUK half a billion a year - Wow !
But I doubt that there's hundreds or thousands of Charities anywhere near that level. Maybe 10 ?
Overall - one trillion including Pharma ? Don't know. ATB