Member Info for TorquayFan

MMMmmmm. Hold on . . . ONW had commented on the need for data, I alluded to that and copied Gooosed's reply to ONW. Not the bit I 'liked' necessarily Ruck, but the bit relevant to the answer to ONW about data.

I think that was right and complete, but, if you want, I'll ask Gooosed if that was OK ?

By all means start a discussion on the other theme. ATB

In response to comments on the need for data, elsewhere, Gooosed makes this point. Mentioned before but a nice reminder anyway :-

''That DATA may first appear in the form of the pre-clinical type via the BioNTech collaboration. A little over 9 weeks until the end of the initial collaboration period.''

You beat me to it WF.

Happy Birthday C7 from me and Supornthip, who remembers you . . .

62 - you're just a youngster. ATB

And please if you have the time, your comments after the meeting will be very much appreciated by all !

Just seen this from Bermuda . . . .

''We know that SCIB2 will used a nanovesicle delivery system instead of the Ichor electroporation device. My understanding is that before CRUK can commence the SCIB2 trial, Scancell are responsible for developing/finalising the delivery system. I would like CH to confirm whether or not this work has now been completed.''

Hope that helps. ATB

That question 15.49 was from Bermudashorts on ADVFN - Crumbs may well have it right but you can always hone the point with Bermuda himself. Thanks for the help and ATB

Over there, a request, maybe on your list already . . .

''If anyone is attending and if they get a chance, it would be great if someone can ask about SCIB2 - especially a definitive, yes/no answer regarding the delivery system.''

Thanks and ATB

Time to let the Man answer for himself - he has plenty to say God knows !

Oh the Boss has been on the line has he ? People having fun and so on ?

So answer the central point - RW. When you asked your Boss - who was 'the' para addressed to ? The answer was what ? Clever game in'it ?

No paranoia here but as I was the only one with that view - as was comprehensively pointed out at the time - 4,5 years ago maybe . . . The bitter goes on - it's insidious stuff of that there's no doubt. I wouldn't expect you to notice.

When you give me the answer, maybe we can reduce the lines back to 100. But those lines will be - ''I must not be hysterical''. YOU do not help C7 at all with this mindless wing man stuff.

I think you should go into Politics . . .

Sorry but the top job in Ukraine has gone - there's many more.

I'm feeling homesick - a leg of lamb in the cooker - minted. That would be nice.

It's just another day. An American trillion indeed Ray P and RW - 158,000 years. Oh joy !

That should keep 'im quiet - Mmm

Yes indeed - it feels like that !

BTW re 'pedantic', I had a good think - you may be right.
So after careful consideration and an ice pack on my brow, 2 lines extra OR less will be accepted, but there I draw the line, (no pun).

Maybe good news one day . . . .

158,000 years - I like it ! AND RW volunteered after all !

Ray P - good try, but must be handwritten only . . . . .

Ruck again ? Pedantic - nonsense. I'd accept ONE extra line, But TWO HHHHHMMmmmmmmmmm

I'll let you know.

Very funny Guys - thanks !

RW I'm quite sure that refers to me - and that's 'knowing' rather than paranoia of any kind.
But if I am wrong I will humbly apologise - you must check with the Boss and enlighten us LOL

I don't mind - it's a simple disagreement on the point - no problem. It's you attempting to make a big thing of it.

I'm off ! How are those lines coming on ?

Thanks for the help RW but I'm sure that WAS me and I don't remember anyone else making that point - but I could be wrong. I'm sure C7 can tell you if you need to know.

I don't labour the point - I'm just replying to the mention of it again.

Now lines - but it'll take at least a trillion to keep you out of your mischief for a while . .

So, 1 trillion - ''I'm a dog with a bone'' - at least that's a short one for you.

That was just MO, (not a lecture) and I still hold the same view - I'd rather BoD got on with their job without having to reply to lots of questions from small shareholders when they are not in a position to give any meaningful answers in reply. Nothing to do with 'respect in ability' blah blah.

It doesn't matter - I don't agree with you - I don't labour the point. I don't know why you do.

BTW on the ProActive website, there is a facility for 'registering' for the event. (I guess you saw that).They also mention 'active vetting' of those wishing to attend but I'm sure I saw another Poster saying it was moreorless open doors.

Anyway, enjoy yourself and the wine and canapes. Look forward to your comments.

CH's 20 minute address may be directed to new Investors - however if there's news in an RNS this week he'll build on that and I guess, either way there'll be plenty of updates and snippets and comment on the SCIB1 / FDA situation . . . 10 minutes of questioning afterwards might be interesting - not sure if any of the ADVFN 'toughies' are going.

After 7.30 pm - 90 minutes of networking and wine and canapes - sounds fun. These addresses are not normally recorded are they ?

Hi. I think H1 2019 is the BoD's promise for the SCIB1 Combo to be rolling, but as yet we are still without an FDA approval with 10 weeks left. You are not alone in these worries. But 10 weeks is a long time . . .

However the delay has been SO long now we should have been told something. CH will be at a ProActive event on Thursday - maybe some news is coming before then and CH will be building on that, or at least, at the Event, surely CH will have to tell us more about the progress or lack of at FDA.

I agree with that totally C7. Steve 67 doesn't post often - that recording was absolutely A1. I had it downloaded but due to reconfiguration - it disappeared. I had an LSE search and was 100's of pages in before my eyes glazed over . .

23C ? Try Chantaburi 36C, Lamphun 42C and Kanchanaburi 44C N.ot recommended

Enjoy your Birthday and Goodnight.

After watching MCFC squeeze, deservedly, past the Spurs - a repeat for you . . .

''If matters posted, which are derogatory after all, cannot be gently questioned, well ?''

Your replies have been hysterical AND you don't help C7. ATB

Re. your reply to my 02.30 - no comment. MO is that we can't read too much into those 2 nevertheless very encouraging appointments - that's all. And Knowlesi is not my 'hero' - that's childish. Leave him out of it?

My original question was factual and polite enough - your reply ''C7 'knows' what got reported because he had it from the horse's mouth, a consequence of thorough research and networking''.

The idea that 2 Posters have in the last few years, reported 'most' of C7's posts is banal. C7 cannot 'know' that because it cannot be so, can it ? As for all your bluster and obfuscation about thorough research and networking - unless you have 'hacked' LSE you have nothing to research or network of ANY import at all.

You do not help your Friend by blowing my question up, out of all proportion. If matters posted, which are derogatory after all, cannot be gently questioned, well ?

I DO have something to do, so nice evening to you.