Member Info for TorquayFan

Nothing could be farther from the truth Scouse. But here's the filter and it's no loss to me.
You've nowt to say. Wish you a good night's sleep.

Just to let you know I've filtered.

I notice you haven't joined the 'anti-semitism' ploy. That's good.

I will apologise for mentioning your book again, but I'm afraid to me you came over in your '''revolting "wide boy" terms''. However, I'm sure you did a great job - it's just when you write about it - same as LSE really.

It's not a threat. It's up to you.

In any honour, even to yourown religion, you should withdraw your 5 accusations of anti-semitism today.

Wholly libellous. Demonstrably so.

I read your book and I don't think you are fit to lecture anybody at all.
I comment on C7 posts, on content only - period !

Presumptive, self aggrandising, manipulative and pompous to the end.

BTW if I'd been in the UK I'd have got C7 to the AGM.
Pathetic RW. Keep writing your stories.

Tomorrow should I post some of his 'off BB' 'loose cannon' manipulation - that'll be fun.

BTW a simple explanation from C7 about the 'WE' error would have gone a long way.

Thanks RW and your conclusion is ?

C7 shame on you for invoking anti-semitism again. Your religion is not a factor and all this carp about hatred etc. is nonsense. It's NOT personal but about the CONTENT of your posts which I have I believe, explained politely but frankly in some detail. And that you do not enjoy.

"You will remain on filter for ever'' - I wish but empty promises as ever. Calm down.

As far as I am aware, there is NO anti-semitism in Thailand - at least I've never come across it. By all means if you have any links I'd be interested to know more. Of course there is anti-semitism in the UK - we've read a lot about it lately and it seems to be getting worse.

To answer your last point, I refer to this to C7 - "When I took you to task on this, an adult reply would have been, "yes TF, I was only talking for myself and some others, not the whole BB actually, so sorry for that". That's it."

C7's endless tantrums in the face of any criticism are often seen, indeed a few weeks ago he told the whole BB to, 'take a walk' but less politely than that. A bad post Ruck.

CH is on circa GBP280K is he not ? You wrote that you were earning 'far better' than that for a 'good few years'. BTW there is NO anti-semitism in Thailand as far as I am aware.

When I took you to task on this, an adult reply would have been, "yes TF, I was only talking for myself and some others, not the whole BB actually, so sorry for that". That's it.

RW your 21.00 is shallow, but you want to continue.

Distasteful as it is, let's look then at C7's assertions around earning 'far better' than GBP280K for a 'good few years' in his 'heyday', thus backing up his unauthorised 'consensus' on this BB about BB LTH's comfort with the level of Director's salaries.

C7 was excessively fortunate apparently while working 30 years in PR or the Ragtrade or Debt recovery but I wonder from where these particular rich pickings came. I have been longer on this BB than you and I well remember C7 explaining amongst some misfortunes, that he was buying SCLP shares from his 'benefits' and I am certain of that - some Posters (not me) were tetchy on the point.

A couple of decades ago, such a sum as say GBP280K +++ would have been very exceptional. C7 I am not diminishing your 'achievements' but that was a surprising claim.

Bye Scouse and Good Luck to you too - your reappearance was not unexpected at all.

RW - not for the first time, IMO you don't help C7 by supporting his 'presumptions' on this BB. You think you help but you don't - a word in his ear would be more to the point.

RW, C7 is not authorised or qualified to speak on behalf of this BB as he consistently tries to. For example, "I think we all agree the salaries they (the BoD) get are not excessive" - no actually, WE don't all agree. WE don't ! In FACT, many LTH would IMO dispute that energetically. And "not a hint of a row all day" - an attempt to whitewash your own crass posting on that day (?) and "Well done everybody". Thanks Boss !

An end to this posing and manipulation would be fine by me ! You post - "It is a shame some posters having nothing better to do than indulge in continuous snide comments etc " - here you are right and this can be observed quickly from your own posting history.

Hi Scouse. You've appeared before on these occasions. You admit you haven't read the posts.

I certainly don't enjoy these exchanges myself but I will defend all my comments - no matter how wild C7's tantrum's become. I'd add that those on this BB who have aided C7 in his 'presumptions' on this BB are IMHO as much to blame for this state of affairs as C7 himself.

Never mind. Scouse, read the posts or don't comment, would be my suggestion. Enjoy your day as I intend to now, a new bell fitted to the bike and pottering off to the Coast. Not bad for an old fella !

Rubbish Scouse. Read the posts !
But I agree with this, "Don't engage its better for your health."

Now you've gone into meltdown again. Calm down and take it easy. ATB

Your personal stuff is not really relevant here M8 but if you post such, it's fair enough that comments may be made. I'm REALLY off now. ATB

IF at fifth you don't succeed - Pharmaphorum this time :-

https://pharmaphorum.com/news/gsk-begins-cancer-cell-therapy-tie-up-with-immatics/?

Bingo ?

C7 you may be right about options 'vested' but unless the options are 'exercised', there won't be much 'skin in the game' will there ?

It's obviously encouraging IF Directors commit their own cash to the Company, but that said, their personal issues (which we have no right to know about), may interfere or preclude.

I'm off now M8 as dawn breaks - TCOY.

Don't continue this - your words were not 'twisted in a disturbing way' and mine were not 'hideous' at all but quite valid.

Your 16.25 Thursday - "I think we all agree the salaries they (the BoD) get 'are not excessive' ", I did far better than that in my heyday".

My reply on 2 points - "you are not qualified or authorised by this BB to say that 'WE' all agree. Further, re. your 'heyday', I'm impressed - was that part of your 30 years in PR or in the debt recovery business you referred to? I think we should all be impressed by your past eminence. Your past earnings, 'far better' than GBP 250 K. Well done !"

Why did I doubt your claim ? When you first arrived on the BB you commented about buying shares from your benefits. It all seems odd and best we move on.

Konar - I think it was concluded earlier that $50 million was for 2 targets identified and it seems that way to me. However, in the context of Scancell needing say $10 million funding this year, that looks handy enough. When's our turn ?

As I said - that's just two links - time for a snooze . . .

hTTp://european-biotechnology.com/up-to-date/latest-news/news/immatics-biotechnologies-lands-eur11bn-deal-with-gsk.html

There it is !