Member Info for TorquayFan

and more to come ? Interesting to see at close. BFN.

That's a possibility C7 but USA progress might help recruitment in the UK too ? Well see.
Gotta be a good chance of GF's 8 pence + at close but . . .

That's the crux of it C7 - "the potential to improve response rates without increasing toxicity."

And "IF the USA trial centre makes some progress that may rub off on recruitment in the UK?"

GLA

WF no one has ever suggested fudging the trial. I think the failure to get new trial centres and Patients dosed has, until now, been a fair concern. Anyway well done Scancell and in Flaherty we trust. IF the USA trial centre makes some progress that may rub off on recruitment in the UK? JMOAE too. ATB

That's a bit hard WF. No one wanted the trial fudged I'm sure but some dosing would be good would it not ? Anyway great news and as we have a USA trial centre now, let's ramp up as Scancell say.

Inan - yesterday SCIB1 Combo was 'stalled' and today, it's not ! (that's what a 'stall' is). Good init ! Crumbs let's hope the new US centre(s) can enrol Patients soonish. Moving forward at last ?

"Dr Keith Flaherty, Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School and Director of Clinical Research at Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, and clinical advisor to Scancell commented: “Although checkpoint inhibitor combinations have improved outcomes for patients with melanoma, the toxicity of combinations such as ipilimumab plus nivolumab means that there remains a need to develop combinations with other investigational agents such as SCIB1, which have the potential to improve response rates without increasing toxicity.”
Dr Cliff Holloway, Chief Executive Officer, Scancell, commented: “We are delighted that our IND is now open, allowing us to progress our SCIB1 Phase 2 trial in the US as well as the UK. Approval will allow us to increase our overall patient recruitment rate and determine whether the addition of SCIB1 to current, standard of care treatment with pembrolizumab increases the anti-cancer response rate in patients with metastatic melanoma.”

Good news indeed - let's hope they can find some Patients to dose . . .

Inan - the point is that L & G had a Plan B (as does every shareholder). L & G are no longer listed as a significant shareholder - I think that might be the point.

I'm just wondering how much L & G invested before divesting ? GBP 6 million ? Just because an Investor is 'in', it doesn't mean they are staying . . .

I agree Vulpes involvement seems firm and I hope they stick around but . . . what do you think their Plan B might be ? Same as L & G's ? We were all so excited about their stake.

Too much waffle about Vulpes - we've not seen new momentum yet.

I'd echo Bunsie - good work this weekend and thanks.

"I am with Vulpes here, nobody puts up nigh on £6m without having a PlanB".
Well you may be right C7 - I don't know. But is it relevant to ask how much for example, L & G put up ? They had a Plan B as you say . . .

1st Patient still not dosed apparently ?
Good that an IND application is being ''pursued . . .

. . . . published this coming week - hopefully.

Wish you a nice weekend. TCOY

It's Weetabix not 'cornflakes'. I spot a quicksand - that's all.

I get it now. My comment is 'interfering' or 'showboating' but as just one small example of your own excesses, when you, Inan make wilful accusation, 'without foundation', (actually without any foundation at all), that's defensible in some way or other.

To explain my motivation in posting, I had very much enjoyed NXC's insights and I feel let's say, 'disappointed' at the way he has been received by some including you now Inan.

'Wrecking ball' - IMO a fair description of your efforts that day, but never mind. BFN.

C7 I'm really sorry you're not feeling good and are doing bad health wise atm and like everyone else, I really wish you well. But my comments on your posts wherever and whenever may be partly to do with what you have posted yourself. You seem angry 07.52 and just now - that won't help. Don't worry about Inan - he played 'wrecking ball' for a day and was replied to - he tells me he does it for fun.

Take care - and good luck C7. We all have our own problems . . . .

"In fact anybody who posts anything worthwhile gets abused". Nonsense M8. TCOY and ATB

Just a couple of lines - hardly a lecture Inan. More blue please . . .

'I hardly ever post' - yep that's just TWO apparently ! Why not post more ?
Bad BB today but the shame is that Inan CAN be so helpful with the science and with other ideas sometimes . . . but !
ATB

Myself I am very grateful to DE for all his insights. Inan some of your posting today has been very poor e.g. to suggest DE had an 'issue' with RG because they had a discussion is potty. I hope DE is not deterred from contributing again by these ill judged responses from yourself (and previously C7 and RW). Bad work today Inan. End of.

Chester - I suggest you should keep posting if you can.

Bermuda - the quicksand is a bad place but please keep posting here.

Inan - assume that's Glycans and AvidiMab ? Myself I'm avid as always . . .

Knowlesi - 'if you can lose your head while all others are keeping theirs' ?
OR words to that effect . . . . GLA