RE: Gap in the chart22 Nov 2021 18:36
GaisKidney and China
What I wrote earlier was based on UT (uncrossing trade) end of day close and open prices. It was not based on bid or offer and the chart works on UT end of day trades and opening UT. They are meaningless if it was say the difference between 82.8 and 83.1p and that was reference to a past discussion with China I had as the charts do ignore small fractional gap percentages of that kind. (It doesn't happen on Pensana, but happens all the time on Fresnillo which is currency affected).
The gap today was the first without an RNS in the history of the Pensana London listing. If the gap remains after 2 more trading days, it may only get filled a long time in the future. Whatever one thinks about it, today was an unusual set up. If it goes up tomorrow it is a breakaway gap especially if it breaks through the down channel resistance which is in the 92-94p area from memory. If Pensana gets out of the down channel then all bets are off on a retreat and it has attracted support to do what it is doing. If it does not get through then all we have seen is a lower high in the current trend and it goes back to 83p area and the gap closes. I will share additional chart data evidence as and when I believe a bottom is in if that happens.
The fundamentalists are looking at the clues given on the AGM and a job advert. I have to admit this is typical of PA to provide the clues and leaving folks to work it all out. It is part of his character to do this and we have seen it several times before. Its a game of do you trust me or not and how bright are you from the clues given. For added fun we get the weekly update to see where different nominee groups have moved up or down in share holdings.
All the best to you two and all the other readers out there, The chartists will like my bits and fundamentalists will like your contributions and that is what makes it a good board to visit. As we look at different things and share them with each other.
regards
Tony