Member Info for tonyj

ITT, did you tell them on other BB you trickle buy early in month, then jump fence, LOL.

You are right I am sure that LTI's words are very helpful.

DYOR

They probably read your comments LTI.

My thoughts are CC is at a staging post where if we get the minimum orders in India we will do alright, if we get say 100m then we will be in the money. Add to this rest of world and there is no looking back. DYOR

Morning LTI, I may have mislead. I was not interested in the various CC products, all I wanted to know is when JC referred to Omnimesh in his last paragraph was this referring to CC products, of any kind, or does the word Omnimesh (stated by JC) cover other companies as well. If it means what I think it was intended to mean then the Gateways we are laying out is the Comms infrastructure for the whole of the area contracted and we are going to supply whatever meters and other connections required, that would be big I suspect.

DYOR

ITT, even I would wonder at $2.50 each. All I wanted to know is if when JC used the word Omnimesh it related to the CC product or was now a general term. My feeling was it related to CC. If so all these gateways are being set up for the connection of millions of CC modules.

DYOR

Hello LTI, just a tidy up. I took the word module to read meter, as you are not likely to have a module in a small gadget but more like a traffic light. My question was about Omnimesh which JC mentions, it was does this related to CC or is Omnimesh a general term used for all multiplatform items. is this something that CC will provide or somebody else. I would suggest that JC would not use this term for another company's product.

DYOR

Hello LTI, just to correct, I was making a statement re Colours comments on your repetition. In this case I found it useful. Did you have a reply regarding 1m Omnimesh and whether that applies to other Smart companies. Considering JC made the comment I assume it relates to CC Omnimesh. What do you think. DYOR

Thanks for repeating RNS LTI I know Colour does not like it. I noticed in JC closing comments he referred to 1m Omnimesh meters. Are other makes referred to by the same name, if not id that the, to be or not to be answer to meters. If Omnimesh is our trade mark then are they our inserts or retro modules. Any idea LTI, am I misreading it. DYOR

That's a reasonable question chuffed. I was trying to work out where all this value was coming. Were these hubs intended to do other things (IoT), so needed to be closer together. Are the hubs being laid in first for maybe changeover to CC Omnimesh meters. I do not think that would have been a leek of confidence to say. CC is now well down the line as far as their product being known and probably analysed in detail. So why all this secrecy now, others don't hide it. New investors hang on these facts when deciding to buy. DYOR

Now you are getting carried away ITT, SIPP time again, GoI want a system that works after past errors where it appeared Cyan stepped in with a 1m unit supply. It is not a small AIM company in India's view I should think, it is an Indian company. Until we hear otherwise Genus still has us in-house and they are a very respectable company. Unless we go bust dont get carried away with balance sheets, it is what is going to happen in very near future that counts.

Over what period do Intellismart 4m installs cover, were the problem ones included, dont forget CC got involved with Intellismart at that stage. Were the 4m including the earlier Smarts. CC appear to have a good but not alarming flow of work, all takes time in India and they are all waiting. It was anticipated CC would get fair chunk of 250m, so as a shareholder of some substance I suggest do not take this time to knock CC otherwise others will suspect your motives. DYOR

Well Colour a late filing should not be habit forming but I have seen companies that have gone a long way past those dates and made good successes in coming years.

I think all eyes are on these tenders and I think CC are still in with Genus, who are doing very well, it is not so much money but quality product, availability (which we are providing) and fast installs once approved. It would now be timely for JC to give a summary of current contracts status and a total volume guestimate for CC of all these unfolding tenders put together. Question to you, do you think we will achieve the 20% 50m units aimed at, I feel we will go way beyond. DYOR

Evening ITT. Why do you think that about Intellismart. We are in-house with Genus, so there is a fair chance that CC will get all or most of their Smart Comms. Genus will do very well with current and future orders, hence their massive SP gain, we do not know if CC has all of their Smart Comms, that would be a useful update from JC. Between these two leaders (Genus/Intellismart) if we had all their Smart Comms we would be well over our 20% of 250m aim. Lots of companies file late. DYOR

Thanks LTI. We are waiting upon these sub contracts but recently (22 Oct) I raised a question regarding subs from Genus and Intellismart. I may be missing something here but with Intellismart I thought we were supplying a Framework and they were issuing out to various new Start Up installations, likewise with a lot of Genus who were putting in CC Smart as they went along. This being the case should CC Comms be part of their initial orders, so if Intellismart get 5m unit order then we get 5m unit order. Probably not as simple as that.

On Silicon was there not an FG28 being tested.

DYOR

LTI, in the case of Silicon, any idea what distance 'long range' means.

As Wirepas use a different system but are also using Silicon it would be nice if JC gave us the pros and cons of the differences.

Thanks Vas..

While we are waiting I think CC need to come up with background on what else is happening.

Christmas approaches so will withdrawals take place again.

Sometime back when we told of our monthly expenses I said that we need to be told of monthly income as well. Appears that was dealt with by not telling us either.

Well Colour that sits well with the Alliance News report of April 23, I assume being new in to Smart they are not going to risk problems. I don't think CC has ever had a bad press or installation default.

Hi Jake, obviously didn't read first BB where it said you or Colour, you are categorically denying it so we wait upon Colour. If I had the BB in front of me I would not have given an alternative. For once use your brain instead of just rubbishing eveything.

Jake, now you are getting jittery, you may have got one wrong, if so a big wrong 1000/600 nearly half, as I said 'you or Colour'?, so if Colour denies then it is back to you. Like Colour you did not have to own the shares as long as it knocks CC. I still see 500p as an outcome for CC but if ever we go broke I will know I am wrong.

By the way as I have said before and proved it by averaging I have never had to sell out or rubbish CC.

you and Colour (he has got reasons) rubbish CC but will willingly take any profits, hopefully in the next 12 months.

Hi Colour. Was it you who highlighted SMS, who have gone roughly from 1000p to 600p.

Regarding Ceres, I think you are misguided to say they were giving out buffoonery when Bosch and Weischal (very big) were buying in, they do their homework. It could well be that such large companies worried the PI's. On a time basis coming forward recently Siemens has created a 100% hydrogen CHP power station in France, this may have had another impact on Ceres, however it may have nothing to do with them.

I will have a look jake, do not want to disappoint you.

In the meantime have a look at SMS I know why it collapsed, perhaps you can spot it.

Sorry you or Colour, mustn't leave him out.