Member Info for tomcat-14

that section is a recap on the points that the court is ruling on... the before ruling... the last bit is ruling...

the list of executors may help to clarify... sounds like secured creditors... ‘executors’... rather than unsecured creditors...

i know... but when i checked the one i use this morning... not that i’m a robot... it wasn’t there... could be it hadn’t refreshed 1st time...

amortization of the amounts or exclusion of the list of creditors presented by zamin in the judicial reorganization process...
i think those listed have already been paid... so they will be removed from the list... amortisation... is that in reference to the payments to the bank creditors then...

it’s just come up in our case now too...
petition waiver of mandate / attached charge protocol no.: wjmj.20.40949265-5 petition type: waiver of mandate / charge date: 7/3/2020 4:41pm...

need verification of what exactly these relate to...
petition id a32c636...
guarantee no.180010317...

it looks like an inverse double whammy in our favour to me... regardless of whether it’s ‘the’ bank guarantees we’re waiting to be cancelled... (which i think it is)... it’s ‘a’ bank guarantee that is instructed to be cancelled... plus those listed creditors are to be removed from the jrp claims account having been paid already... so as we don’t pay them again... twice... 2 bits of great news in one... i’m going to post the preceding text that you’re extract is an extension of... as it gives a fuller appreciation of the context...

regarding the payments made to the executors listed below... even if the amounts released came from a (bank account?) blockade carried out in the accounts of the jointly executed company... due to the recognition of an economic group... but so that there is no unjust enrichment of the parties included in the said list... the court of first instance of the judicial reorganization on such payments is briefly advised to proceed with the amortization of the amounts or exclusion of the list of creditors presented by zamin in the judicial reorganization process...

also... officiate... the banking institution indicated in petition id a32c636... to proceed immediately with the cancellation of letter of guarantee no.180010317... which had been presented by the defendant... but which was not accepted by the court...

it’s back up now squid... but still spare slots showing for the next couple of weeks...

nice graphic...
lithium energy = 20.81kwh/kg...
50g lithium = 1kwh...
they use 8.5kg lithium in a tesla 176.9kwh battery pack...
45kg lce per car...
that’s around the top end of what secker has been telling us for years... 25kg - 50kg per ev...

so who’s controlling this volume button then...

great find cause... it’s definitely constitutional... most of anglo’s appeals refer the courts to the jrp for their labour liabilities... so i wasn’t sure if something had happened that suspended those appeals due to another means of payment now being available...

i’ve also read vw don’t make ice’s... anymore... (at at least one of their factories)... coming sooner than was expected... and so is the electrification of everything else...

the world’s #1...

nope... they censored it... lol

https://tst.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/868998276/arr-8239820175080205/inteiro-teor-868998296?ref=serp ...

looks like monday’s empty slot has been filled... early arrival at anchorage... now queueing to get in...

search zamin...

i can’t decide if it’s constitutional... or if it’s a result of a related ruling... ;)

did you pick up on all the suspensions...

either the banking syndicate definitely takes a uniform position and concludes the negotiation with recuperanda... or starts the execution of its guarantee... which is iron ore... therefore... i grant the 60-day deadline for the union to express itself conclusively regarding the payment structure of its credit or the execution of the guarantee...