Member Info for tomcat-14

hb... it was there before our 1st attempt to ship... just before christmas... and it’s there again now...

i’m beginning to wonder if that ore carrier that’s been hanging around on the amazon for the past several months... is our ship after all... :)

regardless of when they intend to mine this that and the other... the earlier the make a start with this... the quicker they’ll get to the other... :)

now approaching...

does that mean it’s price sensitive... and needs to be rns’d 1st...

don’t forget... we also funded the mobilisation costs required for the start up working capital to begin the operations to commence shipping these stockpiles...

quick ?... what comes first... the ship (chicken)... or the berth (egg)...

has anyone gone to the trouble of going through all those credit qualifications (ob’s link)... to know what the total figure was...

there shouldn’t be any shockers during this process... we appear to have accounted for the full liability on the jrp creditors list... as these credits are partly or fully paid off by the previous owners... the amount included on the jrp creditors list is being reduced accordingly... could be a few nice surprises in there...

don’t mention ackers on this site... but dough is what’s kneaded for a decent rise...

it arrived at the anchorage on 1st july...

it’s a bit too dark that one ob... is the patio full... fuller... >45,000t ore...

100% that’s our berth booked in for 29th july... vessel to be named... gant grace looks like she missed the turn and sailed passed lol... too small anyway... got the wrong destination in it’s tracker by the looks of it...

page 735... looking like they are now entering the enforcement stage and they’re going after assets to pay the creditors... seizures...

what do you make of the amounts... two identical sums... is it a cost that’s been split in half... one half payable by anglo the other half payable by zamin... or is it a charge payable by zamin if they can... but anglo if they can’t... is that zamin or dev... why use the old name if dev... all those entries today has me wondering back into the mine field again... lost...

unless it’s a wind up...

clean break... new entity... and all that... not making the same mistake twice... aka anglo...

just wondering why an egm needs to be called in short notice... if dev already has an attorney... appointed 13may2019... i’m thinking dev’s existing attorney is for the purposes of the jrp/existing owners up to the point of transfer of ownership to pba... and we will need our own attorney... a new one... going forward...

will the companies new attorney being appointed next week... have the power to transfer the ownership of dev... to pba... or can the company directors do all that themselves...

the ones from 22jun is after the jacked up port broke loose... only one piece left... two pieces folded in half on the previous image 28may... there does look to be a growing pile near the new east access from the road... seems to grow in size by 27june... but 7jul... gone again... or is it... image quality is different so could be an illusion... the google earth image still has the two pieces of port... so that pre-dates those june images...