Peer comparison16 Jul 2019 08:45
A good post on Hot Copper overnight, thanks to Gwaihir -
“Posted in the Matador Mining presentation.
Interesting to note that of 80 ASX listed gold explorers and developers, 29 have a resource of greater than 1 million ounces, and that comes down to 13 when you factor in gold grades > 2 g/t.
And that is further reduced to just 6 companies when you factor in sovereign risk based on the Fraser Institute criteria for the top 25 locations.
And that is further reduced to just 4 companies out of the 80 when you factor in metallurgical recoveries greater than 90%.
So we are just left with 4 companies out of 80 (based on these criteria for gold explorers and developers).
Sovereign risk is the one I think that filters out a lot of potentially good companies, like WAF. What they should do is remove sovereign risk from the equation, and then see how many companies remain, my estimate would be about 8 to 10, rather than 4.
Nevertheless, it's an interesting chart, with Calidus being one of the final 4 remaining.”
I can’t get the chart he refers to to copy, but it’s page 5 in this presentation - http://www.investi.com.au/api/announcements/mzz/baf8bebf-20b.pdf
Then thanks to Rusty388 for share price research to go with this -
Current SP's at 1525hrs today:
MZZ - 0.325
BGL - 0.64
EAR - 0.22
CAI - 0.032
Before you all go wild with excitement, BGL’s market cap is $330m, so 6.6 times Calidus, rather than the 20 times SP, but 6.6 times, nonetheless!
GLA