Member Info for Toffers

Excuse me, but didn't I say a couple of weeks ago, they would do best to settle both cases?, and they have subsequently settled one, at least that is something. I have said on the other, it's an IF, and IF they lose, as I have said before, we are not privy to the evidence that will be given in court, and it will be for the Judge to decide and the Judge alone. You nor I know what will happen as we are not privy to that evidence when it is finally given. I have, however stated, that it's not inconceivable that the losing party could appeal, which will drag the matter on further.

Don't believe it E1E01 they had two interested parties for MT back in 2015! It's just a mockery! This is a typical aim company where the sole purpose is to raise funds, because aim companies have difficulties in raising funds any other way, and particularly so I would imagine if the assets are sitting within Russia, and so it's plainly just been a vehicle for raising money. The question is to who's advantage? Mother Russia? it seems that way! my views.

Removed from the Board, the rather spurious ACF report, the tweets of Alexei Boucherer all for what exactly? the list is endless, but the red flags have been flying for a long long time.

I'm sure there is plenty I haven't listed that can be added as red flags, there's plenty of issues that I've raised with links attached.

The real turning point will be the Queeld case, if they lose that then what?

My views as a forum participator.

There's some real rubbish being spouted on here today.

1) the current market cap stands at £78.61m. The whole company could be bought for that right now or less, because it's probably not even worth that. There's no revenue, so there's nothing to be gained from it for anyone, that's partly why no one has bought it.

2) the mines are sat in Russia, the minerals are in Russian soil, the State own the minerals that lie under the ground, the licences belong to subsidiaries who are also Russian. That is a massive risk for anyone to consider, and particularly whilst a war rages, and Russia has alienated itself from the rest of the world.

3) for those who state that the litigation doesn't affect anything, think again, of course it does. You have to remember that Board members are effectively glorified sales men, they are there to sell their company and its products. Do you believe everything a salesman tells you every time you go to purchase something? of course not, for example, you only have to think about estate agents! ha ha! The Board will tell you what they want to tell you, but it isn't necessarily the real truth of what will happen. Too many see Board's as a God, they are not.

Queeld is one of the biggest shareholders in the company. For them to take the company to court is massive. All they wanted was to replace their share certificates like any normal holder would, in fact, this case should be a lesson to you with Eurasia, it's too risky if you should for some reason lose your certificate or your Link registration, and it's not worth the risk imo if they behave this way towards shareholders, so my view remains that they simply didn't want Queeld flooding the market with shares for sale. It didn't suit the Board's purposes/agenda. If, and it is an if, but if Queeld and Mispare win, then the damages are likely to be huge and currently, it seems to me, that the company doesn't have that sort of money to pay, so then what? I have doubts that any indemnity insurer will pick up the tab for it, insurers always have get out clauses! But no one asked, it seems.

As for Logik, the company clearly realised they were on dodgy ground so settled it, but how much have they had to pay in damages and legal costs for the other side and their own? and where is that money coming from, as the claim was for 300k? supposedly, the company only have 40k in cash?

Spikey is right, iknownuffin is completely wrong, but we know that iknownuffin has a hidden agenda along with DR and team!

4) there have been a string of disasters along the way so far, since 2019, the walk out of the previous Nomad without serving notice, the lengthy suspension, the current Nomad who seems to act in an unprofessional manner imo, especially with the shout about a massive divi being forthcoming, the Mike Hammond episode, the Churakov episode and the Board stating after the event that they had no knowledge, the internal row it seems and further suspension whilst DS is rem

Is it normal for a Nomad to be commenting on here?

Let's put it this way friendsps, it's not going to look good for you is it! Nite.

I suggest you do.

Scuba, no, I did say that authorisation from the company would be required from the company at the very least.

There are some really nasty pieces of work on here seamus, and you are one of them, and your alter ego ikn, is another. You both continually abuse, so much so, it wouldn't surprise me if you're both known to the police for domestic violence issues. You both come across as fred flinstone type characters.

30p seamus, have you not read through cloudtag's forum and realised yet that anything Mac aka Aberdeenman is involved in turns in to a disaster? take a read and enlighten yourself.

Yep, pure fantasy!

Is there a link on twitter somewhere where someone can download the recording they did please as I wouldn't mind watching it? I assume the company didn't put out a warning beforehand stating no unauthorised recording etc? Probably not no doubt!

I took a screenshot of Jiffy's posts from very early this morning wherein he concurred with me. Jiffy said "I also pulled out of EUA after digesting and posting this link many, many moons ago. "

The link is the same one I had from uk practical law.

On the concentrate issue, I had said "it belongs to the subsidiary who holds the licence from whence it was excavated!" and Jiffy's answer was "Correct".

IKN then came in as he does and stated "Jiffy, go back to wishing at GST fella" followed by 3 laughing emojis!

Every time someone posts something sensible IKN or one of the disciples has to post something rude, abusive or derogatory. Sickening really that they continually thwart any attempt by others to have a proper debate.

DR is AWOL, sale yesterday, sale today, sale tomorrow merchant and all the rest of his drivel!

No, it wasn't a good week, it's a far worse week as they now have 'low visibility' on a sale, in other words, it's very foggy!

True, if you have a lease, you don't own the land, the freeholder does okay. You can build your house on it, you own the house, but you don't own the land it's built upon.

BBaggins, you're a sensible man I can tell, and I'm sorry that you may well have lost a considerable investment based on fruitless promises by the inept Board and management team of eurasia and due to the fact that it's not what they say, it's what they don't say that is the catch. The red flags started amassing long ago, and that's when I started calling them out and was repeatedly shot down by the gang. As I've said before on here, I've met Mac, and I know exactly how he operates as he has told me, it's sickening, but the problem is he uses a different handle on every share he's involved in, and then it takes time to work out is it him or not. The start of the 'false' contrived rise should have been a real indication but everyone got swept along because the Board produced the somewhat spurious ACF report, and many were fooled by it, that was the catalyst to allow the gang to ramp this even more to high heaven and thus persuade peeps to buy in furiously on the empty promises from the Board and so that the Board could do a placing or two. I was also fooled at this stage. In the background, none of us were told they were fighting the prospect of litigation with one of their biggest shareholders. None of us were told that the said shareholder and another had then issued proceedings in the High Court against the company. That, to my mind, was deceitful, and so they should not be trusted any further. The Nomad shouting from the rooftops that a massive dividend was likely was also another red flag, what consummate professional does such a thing, but then again, he gets paid by the company, so obviously if the company told him to jump off the top storey of a block of flats, he'd probably do it. I wouldn't like to be in his position now that is for sure! There is no sale, I suspect if anyone was at all interested years ago, they've well and truly cleared off since the war began, who would want to risk trying to get metals out of the ground in Russia, when the State already own them whilst unexcavated, and can withdraw the mining licences at any time? the big mining companies go for safe jurisdictions not war torn countries whose leader can change his mind within a nano second. Any sign of a civil conflict and mining companies usually retreat pretty hastily. The deputy russian prime ministers made it clear in their meeting in December last year that metals are required for the domestic market, so all that is likely to happen here is a fire sale to another russian company at cost price or less even! The market cap is so low, anyone truly interested could buy it now for peanuts, but no one is interested it seems! Sadly, I concluded sometime ago that all shareholders own is the soil on top of the land, not the metals in the ground, but what shareholders didn't factor in was the war, nor the High Court proceedings getting in the way of what was already a precarious situation.

NDA's anyone? tut tut! My views.

That's where your wrong Scuba, they are very valid!

Https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/w-011-1888?contextData=(sc.Default)&transitionType=Default&firstPage=true&bhcp=1#co_anchor_a881453

Why don't you push off Nomad, you've helped no one here.