RE: JD PDMR Shareholding RNS?9 Feb 2024 12:59
He is the offeror, read the disclosure table naming Superdry. They are the offeree, and Dunkerton is the offeror.
Then note, "Disclosure of dealings and positions in this offeror is not required” , it's marked there at the bottom on the table.
Then note, "Where an offeror is marked “Disclosure of dealings and positions in this offeror is not required”, (which it is), dealings and positions in relevant securities of that offeror (offeror is Dunkerton)are not required to be disclosed under Rule 8"
Then read why it might be so which is underneath that. There is a "bid situation" so it changes the whole dynamic, and an offeror might not want any other possible bidder knowing how close or otherwise he might be to crossing the 30% line until he's in a position to declare it, and possibly take them by surprise. By knowing whre he might be in the process, will provide an indication of likely price, ie is he likely to wait and pass the 16 Feb deadline which is the first hurdle on price as we know it, or is he accummulating quickly and will come in before, in which case, his bid is almost certainly likely to be higher than the £1.11. It's a matter for him, and I suspect we don't actually know how much he has accummulated so far in reality, it's all part of the game!
Anyhow, not arguing any further. Perhaps the poster with M&A experience can clarify as to his knowledge/interpretation? but I'm just taking it from what I'm reading from the Disclosure Table.