Member Info for Toffeeman123

Last nights posts were far better.

could be a million and one reasons. More potential in the deal in isolation, more potential for other deals on the back of it, desperation to get a deal done, could be any reason.

if a random different company had got a deal with a company whose main backer was Elon Musk or Bill Gates there would be bedlam, ramping to the heavens etc, etc. Well Al Mubarak is not far behind them officially and in reality probably a few quid better off. Wheels within wheels......

yeah lost money, if I were a betting man I would say its evens as to an omission to mention or they just haven't included shares in this deal. You never know, they may have ditched it as a closing technique because of all the grief they get from shareholders about it.

Perhaps the company should put an RNS out every day saying no contract signed, in Spanish of course, then all the folk who believe NFTs are a non starter would be happy, there would be no share dilution, no missed targets and no overdue drops and all would be hunky dory.

Yes, agreed. Perhaps I would choose the headline " Neutral" as opposed to negative on those two issues.

owned by Khaldoon Al Mubarak, who is also, coincidentally, chairman of Manchester City. Don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to see where this club is going.

"There is no guarantee of actual revenue that will be achieved as the target revenue figures are just targets and not forecast or guidance" This is a negative? A negative is no deal. 99% of deals signed every day have only target revenues with no guarantees. Talk about looking for problems. A three year break clause a negative? Most deals signed every day will be for the same and in many cases far less. Most football sponsorship deals are for two years extendable. The other two negatives, I agree.

Could do a club twinning thing.

well they are 18th in La Liga, just like world famous Everton are in the EPL.

now grateful I am not to be someone that only post to mock others when a share they own is going down. What a pitiful existence.

problem for them is that if they said sorry the SGSC thing was a fail, crash the sp everyone selling out then a year later it turns out it has some value they would get crucified. Rock and a hard place.

mainly sells in the morning, buyers waiting to place their orders in the afternoon. Hopefully same today.

many an AIM share out there where the mms would not buy £6ks worth off you in one go.

as you know guzzler, its what my whole play is based on here, either a naked, semi naked short or locked in holder having to buy back in a hurry. I code as well, for what its worth. Don't know a thing about drops or nfts but I guess news of them might help accelerate this rise also. Your sub 11 buy was inspired (I had a small one as well) and I am now the proud beneficiary of £47 profit on my 5 buys here.

been a long time coming. Hopefully the first of many, there were about 200 sells of that size when they brought it down.

hi guys, reading back may have come across a bit grumpy ( I blame Everton), not meaning to be, and my first buy here already up so happy days. GL all

just to be clear I am talking about Diurnal, now owned by Neurocrine. Purchased by them for £48m when their cap was once well over £100m. They don't exist as a company on the Stockmarket anymore, potential or no potential.

I know, I was asked to give an example of a company issuing an RNS that trashed its SP then sold itself afterwards at a low ball rate, the difference between DNL and AGL as businesses is irrelevant to the topic of conversation.

DNL fairly recently for starters.