Member Info for Toffeeman123

Yes, you use deflection tactics.

a sensible and pertinent question from Amtech, wonders never cease.

Guzzler, typical deflection comment. As you well know the comparison was to illustrate confidentiality in business. If you genuinely did not realise that Im probably wasting my typing with you.

When Johnson does one of his after dinner speeches for £150k-£300k it's £15k a ticket to attend. This is a well known thing and is pretty much verbally in the public domain. Try providing a link to prove this, you won't be able to. Your knowledge of how business works and the confidentiality aspects around it are pitifully lacking.

guzzler, so you are saying that the information provided is correct then, just no link is available?

Guzzler, send me a link to the corporate packages offered to clients on the PGA tour, or the EPL, or the ECB or any other major (or minor sporting event) Not just some, but all. When you have, then you can accuse folk of lying, until then your posts are meaningless. You won't be able to by the way as any meaningful hospitality package is confidential as people with money don't want their affairs in the public domain. Best you will come up with is £300 for pie and chips and a programme at Old Trafford.

No, not Tiger Woods, seeing as Tiger Woods is a man. I would have thought a PhD mathematics lecturer would have spotted that or would that need a Nobel Prize winning biologist (who you no doubt teach geometry to)?

Or alternatively, if you are that interested, you could search for it yourself.

LOLOLOLOLOL, teaching maths and physics to PhDs. Gordon Bennett if you're going to joke about something( I assume it's a joke) it helps if it's sort of credible. PhDs are not taught, they have already done that bit, they produce a thesis for review and appraisal. God preserve us.

Cant be long before the next saddo comes along to drop the intelligence average even further. There's one every other hour. Must be a placing for one in the local McDonalds due again soon. Next stop sub 100 IQ.

yep, I personally think it was an error. I remember Everton being late once with the shirts and they sold far less that season than normal, everyone wants the gear in place for the first match. I don't buy the squad thing, Man Utd were selling everything Ronaldo related weeks after they knew he was leaving, who cares if you sell an NFT and the guy leaves? There has obviously been a delay, lets hope its only a slight one.

most folk assumed the Mexico football drops would coincide with the start of the season, so most folk, like it or not, perceive the drops to be late, simple as that. Being late on AIM is a guaranteed fall in SP. Don't need to be Sherlock Holmes.

reckon this will hover round this mark for a week or so, MMs will let folk take their positions at 0.085 to buy with 0.075 stop losses, then on some random day they will drop it, steal the stops, then raise it straight up to 0.09 to buy. It's how they make their little bit extra. Won't let you buy on the drop either. All imho.

is the small mindedness and lack of vision of some. How many folk around the world have heard of Beth Mead? How many on here have heard of her? (England women footballer and Sport Personality of the Year just in case you hadn't) Now raking in multi millions for herself and her sponsors. Just because some no mark sat in their little house in some nondescript small town hasn't heard of Gaby Lopez doesn't mean that she cant be profitable to partner with.

Definitely cant pay for them with mushrooms.

And a million a day or so before that. Encouraging.

Yeah, and I 100% guarantee that if they said they didn't want to issue any more shares the usual suspects would be on here saying it. was the worst thing in the world and doomed the company to failure as they could not expand anymore. Honestly I think the derampers think folk don't see straight through them, creating a dialogue where no outcome is positive at the same time pretending to be aggrieved holders. Pull the other one, its got bells on it.

Pure genius from Amtech highlighting an AIM company that may need to raise funds at some time in the future. Take the same comment and it can be applied to every single company on AIM and 90% of all companies in the entire stock market. So basically the fact they choose to repeatedly post it here shows malevolent intent.

I know, it's a bit like Nike paying Man Utd to wear their shirts in the hope they get a cut from any sales of some projected image. Terrible business model, doomed to failure.

that's less than guzzler spends on replacement question mark keys on his computer keyboard. Very quiet.