A question...2 Apr 2019 14:17
Here's a question that's been bothering me...
Why should SSGI be in a hurry to agree any deal with Vast?
Vast have defaulted on their two loans to SSGI, which are secured against: a) Vast's 80% share of Baita Plai, and b) Vast's 25% stake in Pickstone Peerless. Presumably, the nominal value of the debt is growing all the time as interest charges and penalty fees pile up. And Vast have no available source of money to pay back these debts (except possibly equity placings). Isn't time on SSGI's side, and not on Vast's?
Surely, rather than "buying" Vast's stake in Pickstone Peerless (for debt cancellation and new real money), SSGI could just start court proceedings to seize all the assets concerned for no more than the value of the existing debts and wait for the result? Why would they settle for less than BOTH Pickstone Peerless and Baita Plai, and for no new money?
In short, doesn't SSGI have Vast in a death grip?