NPV for Star Zinc15 Jul 2019 13:45
I believe that market rules dictate that Galileo can't publish a Net Present Value (NPV) for Star Zinc as they haven't issued a formal feasibility study. So here is my down and dirty attempt at a NPV. I've tried to be conservative and pessimistic throughout.
Basic Assumptions:
1. Production of 12,000t of contained zinc per year over 6 years for a total of 72,000t (see recent JORC);
2. Receipt of first revenue in July 2020 (should be easily achievable unless there are major delays in the issuing of the small scale mining licence);
3. Assumed zinc price: $2,500 per tonne (about average for last 3 years);
4. Split of revenues with Jubilee (who will process the ore at Sable): 50/50. (It won't be this simple, of course, as there will be a sliding scale according to the quality of the ore delivered, etc.. But I think this is a pretty good number to start);
5. Star Zinc upfront capex and working capital requirement: $2m (I think this is pretty pessimistic, given we are talking about a simple contract mining and contract trucking set-up);
6. Star Zinc running costs per year: $2m (Colin Bird's own figure)
7. Zambian government own 5% share of Star Zinc and GLR 95%;
8. Discount rate applied to NPV: a highly conservative 15%
= NPV (15%) $38.64m (for Galileo's share of Star Zinc project)
= IRR of 203%
Further exploration at both Star Zinc and Ka****u offers considerable upside potential on this basic model, as does Glenover.
Current mcap of Galileo = less than $3m!!!
In short, IMO, AIM has simply mispriced Galileo's shares. And by a lot. Even allowing for the uncertainty of the mining licence grant, and the need to raise money to start operations at Star Zinc, the share price here should be more like 1.5p to 2p right now, rather than 0.5p.
Thoughts / comments, anybody?