RE: Star Zinc mining licence.13 Feb 2020 08:23
I am wondering if all is well with Jubilee's Kabwe tailings asset. (Note: I don't mean Jubilee's Sable plant, just the mountain of tailings at the old Kabwe mine that Jubilee obtained from BMR).
Over the past few months we have learnt:
1. That Sable will also produce copper, even though it was bought to produce zinc, lead, and vanadium. (Indeed, the first copper has already been produced).
2. That plans for a vanadium line have been shelved. (Note: the Kabwe tailings are very rich in vanadium, the Star Zinc willemite ore is not. Officially, this is due to soft vanadium prices, but this explanation doesn't quite convince me).
3. That plans for the lead line have been pushed out to 2021. (Again, the Kabwe tailings are rich in lead, the Star Zinc ore is not).
4. Also, we have had no news about the conversion of the BMR holding in Kabwe into the planned royalty. In fact, we have had a total news blackout from BMR and from Jubilee about BMR for some time.
From these facts, I sense that there is an obstacle preventing Jubilee from processing the Kabwe tailings through the Sable plant. I don't think it is technical - the acid-leach process is well understood. Rather, I sense it is either legal or bureaucratic. Has somebody brought a lawsuit against the directors of BMR over the sale of Kabwe? Is there some kind of injunction in place? Are there problems with the licence that covers the tailings? Are there unresolved environmental issues?
I've sold out of Jubilee for the time being due to these concerns, even though the PGMs part of their operations must be generating a lot of cash right now.
For Galileo, this is potentially good news. The zinc line at Sable is due to complete in Q2 2020. If my suspicions are right, then they will need a source of high grade willemite zinc ore to feed the plant, not in addition to the Kabwe tailings, but instead of them. I believe this can only come from GLR's Star Zinc; I don't think anybody else mines willemite zinc in Zambia.
Does this make sense, or am I adding 2 + 2 together and making 5, or even 22?