Member Info for threeputt

HOJ, beat me to it with your post of 10:28, was just about to post similar, sales dept would be unlikely to know cash in bank and generally vice versa. Also since when have "orders in pipeline" been contracts in hand, just ask Dragons Den how much they are worth

Not in here but I admire your imagination by montoring sales.
Tell me, did you get some funny looks in the store, or were you able to monitor sales online ?

With respect I would hope your family member works in the accounts department to know how the company is faring, if he/she isn't then they would have little idea whether the company is going under if they are not involved in the shenanigans of covenants, cashflow, debts etc
You can have great sales but if the margins arent covering the costs then there are problems

Fine by me, in at 12

Must be another seller then as the rns in November told us that Geoff Thompson sold his last shares (we saw the exact previous holding as a trade) - Woodford selling then surely ?

Fair. I'd be pleased for the LTH's if that were the case.
But it's that history thing again......

Could also be Woodford selling down as mentioned yesterday, highly likely imo, could also know something we don't

Might be PF getting anxious instead, maybe he's concerned that he won't be able to get away his (as night follows day) fundraise away over par,
- he tried to get a raise by making an acquisition that looks good on paper (except no-one has seen the paper yet) - didn't work.....
- he tried to get a raise by making some pittance director buys - didn't work
- next attempt ?

imo

With a fall like that I would have thought they are obliged to be saying something along the lines of: "We know of no reason for the recent price fall" or yes, there is a reason
As they haven't said anything I'm assuming they know full well why it's fallen

Well the way it's falling from the sky suggests as you say a placing on the way, but at what price ?
And to think I had doubts about selling at 9.5p !!

Last sentence is quite interesting, sounds like they'll do whatever is necessary to keep the oil price stable

"Commenting on output, Saudi Arabia energy minister Khalid al-Falih, said: "If all things remain equal, and they almost certainly will not as things will change - it is a dynamic market - then the technical analysis we saw yesterday .... tells us that there will need to be a reduction of supply from October levels approaching a million barrels."

"The consensus is that we need to do whatever it takes to balance the market. If that means trimming supplies by a million [barrels per day], we will.""

Like I said on the last sentence of my comment "It's a pity that non holders are set upon every time they try to provide balance here"
Not sure why it's always accompanied by the belief of skullduggery, confirmation bias is a dangerous thing

Your last sentence - hopelessly incorrect as far as I am concerned, I'm just a bitter ex-holder who was paying PF's wages

Eldorado, great post at 22:42 yesterday, as a holder it was the sort of negative post I take notice of and your get out early and reinvest lower is the sign of a good trader generally imo. Although a holder at 15 & 12 I've been taking some small trades between 10.5 and 11.70 to offset some of the loss in the meantime, I would ordinarily have bought in just under 11 on Friday but like you I feel a retest of 10p is likely.
It feels however like only yesterday the media were talking 100 oil price, personally I've found that as soon as the media get involved prices tend to go in the opposite direction to what they are spouting, so now that they are spouting gloom we could well see the oil price heading back up

I'm stunned that some of the holders here can be placated by fellow shareholders comments on here in times of concern, that's no way to make your own decisions in a rational way imo, I used to be guilty of that but based my own final decision on concerns about PF and his inability to convert and foul up of the ferry as just one example, I also share the Tosh ("disturbed") view that this board is frequented by PF allies to keep the interest going, it has happened before on Flowgroup and others so why not here.

Giles Hargreave is a great fund manager and his fund(s) have served me well over many years, however I would point out that the fund in which he holds wsg represents only 0.08% of the total fund and is only one of around 300 shares held in that fund, they do not have (and don't expect to have) a flawless record and have held some heavy losers including Crawshaw, Patisserie & Quiz to name a few of late

It's a pity that non holders are set upon every time they try to provide balance here, six years of failure should give them some credence surely

Nice agreement with Hikma today but I think the shadow of the looming court case with GSK will still bear down on us atm until resolution, seems to be hard work generally with all my shares atm - I'm assuming it's the Brexit factor

Haha, sorry Mos no faith any more.
Might do on contract tho !

Not me, I could buy up to £40k

bit of a curveball !

Rexeh, if you're doing 30k (£30k ?) trades here I have to question why you would even feel the need to visit the bb here, even more why it would wind you up so much
Just an observation

and would you be able to borrow more money if you didnt have enough income - no, because you would be seen as a bad loan, that is why debt has to be included in a valuation.
Just imagine you didnt have enough income to pay off the existing debt, you would lose your house if you didnt have enough cash to offset
DOH !!