Member Info for thomasbrowne

I agree but it’s as close as you get, and it’s essentially developed to do the same thing , give strong erections , it’s only a random question,,,LOL

You’ve got a point, could FUM not just sell the med gel separate but with a condom, and tell people to put it into the condom or just rub it on and bypassing everything,,LOL... it’s a interesting question ?! LOL it’s near enough the same ingredients . Obviously it can’t be that easy or we would be doing it ? One for JB maybe?

It could be a very good time to buy ,,,
Lombard is still selling its 7p bought shares and realising it's good fortune
Anything over 7p and its delighted,,,,, but the impact on investors confidence is evident, I've stated that many times, they have there cautious strategic objectives, and possibly smaller investors might be able to capitalize on their need to take a great profit for themselves.
So now or whenever Lombards selling order is fulfilled would be a great time to buy fums shares.
They might have some way to go before that selling order is fulfilled ,so buyer beware,,,,IMHO,,,GLA,,,,

I think fum has already implied that our CSD condom has been put on the backburner to reduce our cash burn rate, as our CSD condom was costing four hundred thousand pounds just to maintain it's rolling development cost.
And it's importance is summed up with fums own statement ,,,,,,,,it's NON CORE MOVING FORWARD,,,,,,,

The med2005 med gel is the product that will be the reason we get snapped up by one of the major industry players, and I just can't believe that several bidders wouldn't emerge , this med gel alone is worth, at its very basics value ,several times our current valuation. It's in a class of its own. Im still astonished that the big major companies don't see the compelling synergies to some of there own products. There will be a substantial premium with competing offers. I'm confident about this and our med2005 trials,
Our 3rd trial will basically confirm what these big pharmaceutical companies need to do around paying up for the opportunity to secure a licence with us, and that upfront payment will leave us with a healthier bank balance to move forwards and get other upfront payments and licences with our TPR pain meds.
Or one of these big pharmaceutical companies will just make a knockout bid for the whole lot, and sell off what they don't require. It's our med gel that really could be a blockbuster product , but only in the right hands. At its basic selling point, it still worth many times our current valuation.
Aimho,,,,,GLA,,,,

Great to see a steady increase, this is the direction we would be going without our largest shareholder selling into the big buying sprees .
One of our largest markets is the OTC MARKET, and without a prescription you can’t just buy our med gel , but it seems to me that the OTC market won’t be a obstacle to selling , even though that can take another 3 years of selling MED on prescription before clearance to the OTC MARKET,
Right now more and more people are just purchasing there mediciations online, to the point where it’s as common as people just owning smart phones, we mostly expect a prescription from your own GP for med, but it is just so easy to bypass our GP , and order it with a prescription online,
Online buying is literally changing by the hour, and from our first assessments to buying our med gel by our research companies,until the time it gets clearance to sell it on prescription , that time span has altered the figures massively, I’m guessing our prescription online sales could massively surpass them older research med gel sales figures, in other words our initial sales of our med gel could be substantial higher than any forecast to date.
Just think about when people initially bought into futura, and the Change and upward trajectory in prescribing medication online. Explosive growth in this area and in every area, pensil in the normal reluctance and avoidance of a GP visit , and you can see why people will get most of there erectile prescriptions online. its not really even avoidance, it will be seen as the norm in this area of erectile dysfunction.
I reiterate the online sales of our med gel could or should have a unforeseen online explosive growth .
The online sales market has changed massively in the last number of years. And that changes all our sales projections upwards,,,,,,,, if we are not snapped up by a industry giant at some point ,then I’m not living in the real world.,,,,GLA,,,OIMHO

If Lombard can just give the SP a decent holiday from its strategic selling , I'm convinced the SP can make a spectacular gain over the next year or so, it's looking good now and gaining ground in a manner expected
When a big institutional holder stops or pauses its share reduction sell off .their selling just distorts everything. Without Lombards sells I wouldn't have been surprised to see a 27p SP right now.
It's just going to take a bit of good news around pain meds or any good news to give us some spectacular gains this year. Nobody really knows just how big our med gel will be, just that it's a near guaranteed winning product that's going to sell exceptionally well.
A great year a head,,,,,GLA,,,,,

Oilovlam I would agree with you it probably would be safer to pencil in a 2021 regulatory submission, though what I did get from that excellent in my opinion presentation , was that the bigger the patient trial the better the data that's coming back from it, and naturally the regulators would want as much data as humanly possible to safely deliver a formal determination for everyone concerned.
Normally a fast track approach would happen if the treatment was for a serious illness or condition, so I don't know we're erectile dysfunction lies in that regulatory category?.
Because there's no actual urgency with our med gel , the regulators would presumably ask for all possible trials to be carried out before their determination, but because the 2nd trials results were so well received, and the safety data was substantially increasing as the number of patients increased, then it's not difficult to deduct from all this that the final safety data should be at a exceptionally high level. It's not rocket science to think that GTN applied to the mouth for angina could be reformulated to deliver the same safe ingredients into the penis, and just giving another fantastic use for GTN , a very old and trusted medication.

Oilovlam I'm not entirely sure just how far our current funds will last, but as you say probably until our trials have ended, I know it's very important ,but I really feel a reasonable fee coming from a milestone payment
Should reduce the chances of another need for a big cash call. Factor in more New licencing fees for TPR100 and any other income, should have us pointing in the right direction,,,,
But I stress if these big pharmaceutical companies see compelling data coming out at the years end , do you not think they will see us as another great ED treatment buy, and just watching that presentation told me what I mostly need to know about how that's going to turn out. ( FANTASTIC )
GLA,,,,

+ that angina spray that goes into the mouth wouldn't taste nice? And patients would only take whats recommend and needed to control angina pain , but when it comes to pleasure we all know that x amount of people will always go over the recommended dosage and increase the GTN in the plasma levels. And that wouldn't be recommended at all, how do you put 2/3 spray amounts into a bottle ? .and that's why our med gel will go into a tiny tube with only one application in it, the size of a airlines toothpaste tube,
The point I'm really making here is accidentally ? Or not , the angina patients are proving that the GTN ingredients is causing good erections for themselves, and the placebo effect is only a incidental side effect of our med gels application. And as shown in that boring ? Presentation, the placebo percentage effect will massively decrease with the higher numbers of patients used in any trial.
There's also the blood pressure side effect and that has shown to be absolutely minimal to the point any increase was nearly put down to a man in a white coat effect , raising the blood pressure that tiny amount.

Viagra type pills raise blood pressure, and can't be used for people with bad/ compromised hearts , and that's were our med gel comes in ,and caters for all these types of patients, the reason we're highly recommended as a 1st line of treatments , is that we're safe and easy to use and the best point of entry for anyone with Erectile dysfunctional problems, and absolutely the first choice if a patient has angina and any type of heart problem, and as they stated in that ( boring. ? ) presentation, Americans differ from us in that they actually ask their own doctors to prescribe a medication for them, where as we go to our doctors with a ailment and wait and see what our doctor recommends ,regarding treatments etc.
There's a lot to be learned in that presentation, but I guess it's not for everyone,
Some of that scientific research that was presented in the right hands can give a canny investor a massive head start over institutional investors who need days weeks to interpret it for a share purchase,
And that's why it's so important to even watch a presentation several times over.
I'm saying this not just as a futura shareholder , but on a very observational basic level, and that is the MED GEL is at its very core a exceptional safe and decades of tested GTN ingredients and New entrant to the erectile market. And this really could be a blockbuster product in this growing marketplace.
The DATA generated in our 3rd trial will speak for itself and louder than any words spoken in any presentation. Do you know why I'm so confident, because the data in our 2nd trial was so compelling and good, even the urologist own journals thought it well worth a good write-up . And that speaks for itself.
AIMHO,,,,,,GLA,,,,,

And can't be touched,,,,,LOL,,,

Intended use, and if you require another use for it, you have to go through all the years of trials we've went through, and that's a long time, and also how could you safely stop people spraying on more than the safest dose from a spray bottle, the EU and FDA wouldn't trust that method at all, there's to high a chance people would over dose. We are the gold standard in my humble opinion. Adjuvant be touched..

AIMHO,,,,GLA

Oilovlam most presentations that long will be boring in some if not a lot of parts , but if you don't watch it yourself, then your relying on some else's interpretations of the presentation, and I wouldn't recommend that to anyone , unless that other person was a very trusted and experienced investor, hawkhead has no current shareholding according to him, so it's no surprise he doesn't want to spend hours analysing that presentation, and that's fair enough, I can now completely understand his position, my guess is that the more shares you hold in futura or the more of your total wealth tied up in it , then the more a person would follow up in every interview and analysis presentation ,

Ken James stated there is the potential of a regulatory submission in th EU in 2020 if the med gels data is so compelling and basically safe, and everything I heard in that presentation indicated a high likelihood for that to be the case.
I genuinely and not because I'm a shareholder , I believe the med gel is a very safe and ED transformational product.,,,,,the GTN ingredients has already been tested extensively, and in that presentation what came out of it for me, was the exceptional safety data coming out of each trial, and every time they increase the number of people in the trials the safety data increases exponentially.

Just look at the headaches dropping right down to 1/2% of participants in the trials ,and with no change even with increased dosage, that's exceptional in my opinion, and because we have this fantastic ingredient of GTN working for us.
You seen the presenters faces on numerous occasions during that presentation , and that they were on numerous occasions really surprised at the data already flowing from the 2nd trial, they were saying even they didn't expect to see such low side effects and no increase in side effects on several markers after the dosage was increased.
So will the 3rd trials data be so compelling to go for a EU regulatory submission in 2020? You decide ? That is if you follow the companies news flow or presentation to shareholders and analysis.
Not everyone who watches that presentation once will get it,,,including myself,,,,sometimes it takes several viewings to properly absorbed all the information and body language and facial and eye movements during the Q&A , the little question a analysis asked? The GTN angina spray could it be used for the same application as our gel,,,,,,, I've often wondered about that? ,,as angina patients had used it for helping themselves with erections, and that's a widely reported fact, (1) it shows you the GTN ingredients works well ,
(2) it shows you even angina patients can safely use it,,,,,,,without any reported fatalities to date.
(3) the angina spray doesn't even work as well as our dermasystem ,which is specifically designed for penis
Applications.
(4) the angina spray cannot be sold or used for any other application other than its i

Hawkhead if your nothing else then your very entertaining,,LOL,,
All the answers to your respectful questions are in my last post ,,
Whether you made £7000 or 7p nobody can verify that only you, and we all know why you wouldn’t want to prove that ,,LOL,,,,,
I have a busy and really nice day lined up here in Belfast,so I will leave you with your huge sums of cash you’ve made with FUM,? LOL,,LOL,,,and get on with my day,,,, have a great day Hawkhead XXX GLA

Hawkhead your giving this forum your whole day 16+ hours of your attention, and sparring with ananda and others including myself ,about a AIM company / futura medical and you can't make the time to watch futuras presentation about its number one product ,,,our MED GEL,,,, does that even sound like a reasonable
Investment strategy,,,,, of course it doesn't,,,LOL,,,,, but your clever enough person to know that,
So that leaves me thinking do you hold any shares ? Maybe you do , but it's minimal, and its not enough to be bothered watching the whole presentation, and you would rather just read over ananadas old post for 16+ hours to Learn something from ananda? ,,,,LOL,,,,
Hawkhead I agree with you looking over the old fum proactive interviews ( is ) like groundhog day,
And I can share your genuine frustration around product developments,
But if your a genuine investor in futura it's probably sensibly to keep up with any analysis presentations,
If you couldn't get access to the presentations, you know and I know you would be screaming about it here,
LOL,,,,LOL,,,and I would be calming you down,,,LOL,,,
as I've said before hawkhead sometimes you can watch the B.O.D body language around awkward questions and answers and draw your own conclusions, and that can give you a advantageous head start with investing. You know that's right , but if you would rather avoid any presentation, well that's your prerogative, and I respect that hawkhead. ,,,,AIMHO,,,,GLA,,,,

Hawkhead it's not about one thing that was said in that presentation, !! , its about one thing that might have been said during that presentation, and if you didn't watch it ,then you will never know, and my interpretation of the presentation may not be the same as yours, watching them gives you experience of who and what sounds credible, some people are more. Experienced at seeing through a dodgy story and weaknesses in a companies business plan,
If you don't watch presentations your at a serious disadvantage to other investors, would you want that if you held a large shareholding, absolutely not ,,,, ,or maybe your shareholding is minimal, that might explain your position better?,,,,,,
Obviously we can all just please ourselves no matter what, but just as daringinvestor noticed your presentation position ,I also was taken back about it.
Hawkhead if it works for you , then work away,,,,,LOL,,,AIMHO,,,,GLA,,,,

Zwartkops I totally agree with you about Pfizer potentially benefiting the most from our med gel, but I can't see them paying tens of millions to bin it, our med gel would be a incredible product to sell alongside viagra,
Or simply give it away with viagra ? What ED tablet would people buy if one of them tablets had a handy we med gel free along side it? , I know what I would buy ,,,,,LOL,,, people want choices and that's why our gel will be sought after and fought over during a biding war.,,,AIMHO,,,,GLA,,,,

Hawkhead I also seen that hour ++ for the presentation, and I to thought this will be a long time watching this, and yes you could nearly watch a film instead,,,LOL,,,
But if your holding a reasonable amount of shares, then not watching that presentation would be a serious flaw in your
Investing strategy. Or maybe the level of your shareholding didn’t merit that amount of time watching the presentation?!
Or is it possible you simply find it difficult to concentrate doing one thing at a time, jumping from one thing to another and unable to stop yourself, there’s a lot of ADHD around now days, and that sadly can explain a lot of people’s problems and actions, and a lot of people don’t even know they suffer with this condition,
I would say nearly all investors watched that presentation, I’ve watched it twice over that week.
Sometimes just sometimes someone can say something in a presentation that gets people excited or reassured about a product or business plan. And it’s for me very important that a management have credibility and a focus on what they want to achieve for investors. And a presentation is our opportunity to assess everything the BOD present to us.
Honestly Hawkhead to hear that a FUM shareholder didn’t watch that full presentation at all , I found that alarming!!! But in a respectful way to you.

Joking set aside, parity10 you are correct it is unsettling for our biggest shareholder to drip feed a large percentage of its shares into the market, but obviously Lombard have to capitalize on there latest share buy
And reduce their overall loss,
For any old or new shareholders it gives the impression of a lack of faith in the proposition of our med gel not meeting its sales targets.
But Lombard are effectively keeping us afloat , and they have a duty to their own investors first, so I can understand their cautious approach to their holding.
If Futura can deliver. On the med gel , then all your concerns will disappear with a decent profit,
It really is a case of grin and bear it while Lombard do their bookkeeping.
I'm very confident the med gel can get there and get past all regulatory hurdles, it should be a blockbuster product for this type of treatment, creams & Gels , but probably not compared to viagra type pills, but I Will be very happy to be proven wrong here. When Lombard stop selling we should see a much higher share price, if they get any hint of a really big pharmaceutical company aligning itself to our med gel then they might even start adding to their holding.,,,LOL,,, our med gel will be bought by the public and completely outright by a large pharmaceutical company and for substantially more than we're worth right now, And that could even be just over a year from now. It will be a exciting year ahead and its all to play for.,,,AIMHO,,,,,GLA,,,,

Do the lottery

I’m guessing Lombards advisers and selling agent, has seen that big 400.000 buy and decided to nearly match it with a equally big sell ? I think that’s the way they work, to create a orderly reduction in their holding,
As I’ve said before it’s difficult to get a SP moving to any reasonable level while Lombard need to offload a large percentage of there holding, I’ve seen this exact problem holding a SP back for over 2 years , we just have to grin and bear it, or sell ourselves,,, LOL,, and sadly that’s what compounds the problem.
Anyone who comes on here and states they’ve bought or sold x amount of shares , well truth or Lie if it’s how they create there own reality and their happy doing it, so be it, who am I to burst there we bubble,, fact or fiction ,
As long as it’s not costing me any money,,,LOL AIMHO,,,GLA

No thedarkyhorse ,sorry ,,LOL,, I got your take on that perfectly, I just didn't properly acknowledge you,
I totally agree with your view that Labour walkers should put themselves up for re-election, as yes, they were elected on a Labour manifesto, honour and credibility, it's hard to find in politics ,,LOL,,, only because we're Humans with millions of years of primitive flaws,,,LOL,,,
Thedarkyhorse your a good sound poster,,,,,,GLA,,,,,