RE: Phase 3 results7 May 2019 21:05
I just wish to highlight something ,,,,,,our decades of being used GTN active ingredients ,is being used safely and very happily by nearly every hospital in the world,,,,,,it's been examined and tested extensively by every regulatory body, in practicality every country in the world,,,,,,,,,,,so it's safe to say that GTN is a very safe long term extensively used chemical,,,,,,,,,
We are just taking it from the mouth, in angina patients, and using our transdermal SYSTEM to quickly and safely deliver it into the bloodstream for another part of the body/ penis,,,,,,,, there's nothing too complicated about that,,,apart from just making sure it gives a strong quick erection , and probably giving the same low level side effect as the angina patients experience.
Naturally if a big multinational company is going to part with a large upfront licencing payment ,,, it might or has asked for a larger 3rd trial before it parts with millions of pounds of upfront licencing payments,
It reduces their risk , as their plan might have been all along ,,,,,,to buy us out this year our early next year ,at a price they've already decided last year. And they didn't have to fork any money out upfront,,,,,,,same price ,,,,,,,less the ,3rd trial cost,,,,,and less risk for them,,,,,,,forget about the 50% extra we hear mentioned,,,, they already know what a knockout price they are going to hit us with,,,,,,,,,,,,,highly subjective,,,,,,,,,,
But very possible .
Ken James supposedly said a 20% chance of failure,,,,,that sounds reasonable as it gives us a 80% pass rate,,,,,,any pharmaceutical company would jump at a very possible 80% pass rate,,,,,remember ken James is probably only referring to our efficacy in giving a 100% erections, with all the erectile patients efficacy target points,,,,,,,,the safety profile of our active ingredients GTN. Really can't or shouldn't come into question. It's been extensively documented from 1878 when it was first tested and used,,,,,,,,,,,yes the year 1878,,,,,,,,,,so it's safety profile around the world is well understood and documented.
The confusing placebo effect in our trials is completely understandable,,,,,,, the majority of people would get aroused when rubbing anything into their own penis,,,,,,,even during a soapy relaxing shower I'm sure we've all had this experience,,,,,,unless your not male or unwell .
I'm confident this percentage will fall substantially with the larger trial,,,,,,,if they tested a viagra user after taking a blue pill ,,,,30/50+ minutes later and said now rub your penis,,,,,and asked ,is it the viagra or you rubbing your penis that's got you erect,,,,,,how would you know for sure,,,,,,and then they tell you your viagra was a placebo sugar pill,,,,,,
Of course large amounts of people will get aroused by the very nature of what they are doing to their penis,
By just rubbing it,,,,,,,,so effectively viagra and our med gel would probably have near same test result
Sign In
Follow the stocks
