RE: RNS Reflection6 Feb 2020 20:26
Hi Londoner,
I don't think the OAG/OGA figures for oil are the same as company reported figures. If they have declared that then I have missed it, happy to be proved wrong. The company and partners hardly ever report bopd so there is little comparison to be made, Kraken 2018 at 99.74% of OGA my only example since 2017. Close, I agree but no cigar.
I think the company reported figures are for saleable product which is what I am interested in. That leaves us trying to extrapolate how much gas from OGA figures is saleable, that is not flared or fuel, on top of what oil is saleable, that is not used as "fuel process" or lost as value in the mingle.
My retro shrinking, where I take out some gas and then take another % hit on remaining site specific boepd seemed to be finding a pattern but is out now we are at year end 2019.
With hindsight, and remembering I am trying to establish saleable product, I think this method would need to be adaptable year in year out, for example how do you deal with the possibility that a tanker of oga reported oil from Enquest Producer is not being sold but delivered to Kraken as fuel as purported.
Anyhow, it all gets a bit complex but if I take out all my oil shrinkage and leave gas deductions as is I get 67117 Dec 19 so we are both in a zone.
I'll graph and write some 2020 predictions when I get a chance, maybe after FY report.
Best to you and GLAXXX