Member Info for theeaccountant

thank you for the generous rating, I should sleep like a log tonight!! However, you have clearly failed to answer my question and therefore attempted to mock my perfectly reasonable post instead. I fear that you may be the prime example of a clueless ramper that can be found littered across several LSE boards. Come on, justify a 100% SP in your beloved AML!! Any share that you are passionate about and truly believe will continue to increase you should easily be able to justify the movement. I am all for people ramping if it is based on factual content and it is realistic, this clearly does not apply to you though.

I am not a deramper at all, I have no intention on picking up shares in AML, I have flipped my shares already for a healthy profit. As correctly identified by Roxbury, the share price rise off the back of a new CEO appointment and potentially entering F1 (which is no guaranteed success by any means) is not worthy of a 100% share price increase imo. Perhaps there are many aston martin car fans here that buy shares because they like AM cars, regardless of the business performance or financial position of the company. There is certainly potential in AML but it needs to be proven, currently there are a few too many wishful thinkers. Feel free to explain how the 100% SP increase is justified CC, I would genuinely be interested to hear.

I think the performance of AML since the directoriate change has been interesting, not entirely sure how a 100% increase is justified though. Think there could be a few people here left carrying babies

forensic I am comparing two legal industry businesses that have very similar financial positions and then comparing their stats, I am not performing detailed analysis but are you honestly telling me that MANO is worth double even though both companies have very similar positions? The nature of their business is not a sig factor in this method of valuation

Why would EVE be desperate to get cash flow in when they are currently in a £7m net cash position and burning £0.1m per month? Their latest trading update was positive and that has not been reflected in this current price

SLP has been covered multiple times by Simon Thompson on investors chronicle, he often identifies strong AIM buys

along with the fact that we were not informed of the original 1m share selling but they did manage to release a separate RNS in between the selling of TB 2m shares, absolute joke

this is ridiculous, surely this can not be legal? Sell 2m shares causing 20% price drop then buy 1m shares back on the dip?

Long story short, no one has any idea of these contracts. It was expected/hoped that other contracts would have been announced by now but there is nothing. Contract news is imminent but admittedly that is partly wishful thinking. Still a good company with good structure though, just needs another contract and it should fly

hi dago, this share is incredibly undervalued, it just doesnt get much coverage. No reason for the steady decline to be honest and if anything it will benefit from COVID as some aussie businesses enter into liquidation. Announced last week that litigation funders require a AFSL license and LIT is the only one in Australia to hold this license. The future definitely looks bright, if you compare this to MANO it goes to show that either LIT is severely undervalued or MANO is massively overvalued, either way two very comparable companies with a massive differene in mcap.

Simon Thompson has also written several articles on LIT over year and is one that he recommends too, would expect coverage from him soon.

Would strongly recommend this share

Jeez, I simply can not believe some of the posts in this share chat. All of you people saying you are left with worthless shares, the share price has not dropped much at all in a few weeks. If you bought shares on a whim without doing research and expecting to flip the shares the next day for 1000% profit you need to move on. You will be the same idiots that will not be shutting up when tomorrow it is up 10%. As for madeira, dufry, destitute etc please can you just leave this share chat? Fed up of your meaningless comments where you provide no actual value to the board.

do your research on the company and you will have faith, if you are there slating this share then you simply have not done your research, end of.

just out of curiosity, what makes you think today was such a strong day? seemed a modest close in comparison to +7% earlier in the day? seeing as all markets were up today and had strong closes this seems quite average? Not complaining imo but just curious about your thoughts

good news coming from the RNS, looks like it will definitely give LIT a strong competitive advantage, espically as it is currently the only litigation funder in the whole of australia with an AFSL

The SP has fallen far too much here, bargain buy right now. Im in

I feel like many people looking and commenting on this board are here either for a quick buck or shoddy attempt at a deramp. This is a long term investment, all these people saying how crap the share is have no substantiation behind it other than the fact there have been a couple of placings. So what if there have been a couple of placings, they have been a source of cash which I would much rather them choose than to take out a loan. The company is debt free, now has good cash flow and is a slow cash burning entity. Chill out, all the haters please stop slating the share, if you have no interest in it then jog on? For all the actual investors enjoy the ride for the years ahead and stop waiting for a massive contract every morning! GLA

Agree with the points made re Krunch RTO however, you can not deny that this is a great AIM shell for any other RTO. Any debt AIM shell commands a minimum level of mcap, just look at MTFB

I managed to enjoy my weekend until I saw Dufry appear late on a sunday eve, you never fail to disappoint me Dufry. The audacity to predict other companies being aim scandals when you sit on ESL, I love it

3m after the placing im guessing

because as someone else said below, they could probably get away with saying their service is compatible with those companies. So for example they could increase the audiences the customers could reach on those platforms or it could relate to the data krunch can analyse e.g. can help a company analyse its instagram followers/audience/likes etc. Trust me though, you would not find a company that has contracts with companies of that size and still only have a market cap of 1-2m or whatever it is these days lol

it clearly is market sensitive, if mobile streams announced contacts with WB, Vodafone, Twitter & Facebook then the shareprice would 100 bag lol