Member Info for TheBeastofBodmin

CS commented on this at the AGM (Aubrey I doubt was present) 'we are very hopeful a sale will be completed this year'

Thats this year not September

'and there are a number of reasons for that but because of confidentiality with the parties to whom we are speaking we cannot say more then that for the moment'

Along with

'Critical year for EUA'

'NDA's still in place new one signed in June, original buyer still at the table'

Those are the facts delivered by the EUA BoD AGM July 26th 23

They don’t like it up em….🤣👍🥧🪳

That was someone in the TG group who mailed the company and received a reply post thanking them for responding to the request!

🤥

Neghead pork pie 🥧 served with a sizeable dollop of BS 🤣🤣🤣

East Cheshire Hospice

Yeah I have noted the charity and I will honour a donation when/assuming EUA sells, that way you get a considerably larger donation than you would now and also it might stop you virtue signalling about a bet that no one in their right mind believed?

'questioning a share you own he’s against it'

You don't own anything here, if you did you would have been on the AGM call just over a month ago where the question you asked was covered and updated on this bb multiple times?

The only thing weird is how many weird non-investors keep asking the same questions in a company they have zero financial interest?

We know what was said at the AGM, no need to post all weekend we can leave that to the neghead saddos 🤥🤡🤡🤡

Concur a bet is a bet and should be paid, it was always a daft one mind not sure where the end of August conviction came from?

Charity aside totally irrelevant but something for the negheads to wibble on about it's not like they have a lot else going for them?

the ****roach 🪳 how perfectly apt 🤣

from the tone of it’s posts appears to have had a heavy weekend on the sherry, full of bitterness and self loathing 🤥

and it’s unwanted love child tc popped for some bittyyyyyy 🤡🤡🤡

'yes. (but i suspect holders might not have liked it if they did.) '

Your full of it, you were the one insisting the company would not get a NOMAD remember?

How did that work out for you?

If we could push up to the 4's then it might indicate some serious interest as been stuck in the current range for what seems like an eternity?

'I'll take some time off for a couple of months and maybe pop back on in November ish'

'I'll be back on Monday to congratulate the winner of the charity bet.......'

In the name of God....just go! :D

China will be fully onboard with buying assets from Russia, as will the rest of the BRICS.

Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. From owning 9% of global oil reserves, the enlarged BRICS+ group will account for 41%;

and from producing 20% of global oil production, BRICS plus its three Gulf members would increase the new BRICS+ production share to 42%.

Ehhh 'ex holders' who have never had a positive word to say about the company blaming people who remain positive for 'buying' the shares they never held in the first place?

It's a neghead staple that old chesnut :D

' This board has become a playground where two opposing forces are trying to make the other think the way that they do'

A playground I would agree, but do I want them to think the same way no not at all I could not care less they are totally irrelevant and immaterial to any outcome.

That won’t effect us though will it, we have already been reliably informed by neghead inc we won’t sell anything and what we want to sell is worthless?

🤡

EUA have created a considerable work force at the WK mine along with the additional work created during preperation and value creation mining PGM's.

What sort of work force would be required by a buyer for MT flanks et all? A much larger one along with further considerable value creation.

Bit of a faux pas that one....ooops!

I don't know why they are demanding confirmation of EUA's resources it's not like they would invest and not as if the investors are encouraging them to invest either?

On the contrary we don't want you the company doesn't want you and given the amount of time you waste here week in week out very much doubt anyone else does either? :D

I wanted to buy a Porsche 911 the other year so went into the showroom and offered them a straight PX for my mini cooper.

I evaluated they were of compatible value as they both had 4 wheels?

The reason no one is taking it seriously is because it is based on non EUA related data and is purely conjecture.

The reality

- Sinosteel deal still in place with procurement $176 million

- Original buyer still at the table

- Private ii bought at 26p (assume they might have considered the value prior)?

- ACF report valued multiple of todays value (scorned by negheads but whats new)?

- HC Wainright produced their own report open to investors multiples of todays value.

So having seen the HC Wainright report I use that as my reference as they had full access to the EUA data unlike those who continually attempt to push a negative agenda.