Member Info for TheBeastofBodmin

Be interested to know Mr Rawlinsons opinion in regard to Gowlings competence with this petition? :D

Even more bizarre are the ones who claim to be invested or recently invested and proceed to regurgitate the same posts of negativity multiple times a day on the company they claim to be invested in?

We have seen this phenom countless times from assorted individuals along with the ‘I won’t be posting further’ mob which guarantees a further raft of bilge the following day?

Absolute circus 🎪

FYI....Court proceedings relating to tax offences officially suspended by the RF supreme court hence should change the tax law allowing KK to potentially win case.

I don't copy anyone else's links from telegram but that the gist of it.

When you look at what the BoD have achieved prior and during the war bringing WK to production a DFS at MT and clearly packaged the company for sale with the original buyer still at the table and others also tendering apart from delivering the sale I don't know what more they could have done given the geo political sh*t show we now endure?

Of course Del and co will say 'the sale' but if it were as simple as they appear to imply for multiple X the current SP any clown could do it, subsequently we have the expertise to deliver and they should be judged when that process is complete and not during it.

Subsequently retain full faith in the BoD the clowns can stay here on LSE :D

No they did not quite the opposite which they confirmed during the AGM.

'Not sure who you are answering, as they're on my filtered list. But it is a complete waste of time talking to them, unless they experience a paradigm shift in their version of reality'

100% long since gave up wasting my time responding to their nonsense and binned the lot of them along with any new entity that intermittently crops up.

Let them waste their time not yours IMO.

'Can the company receive offers and not put them to shareholders?'

If the company recieve a binding offer they consider fair value then no, an offer of this magitude is all that is relavant I do not think the BoD are hanging on a AMC peanuts & pennys type deal.

morning all,

good to hear from the crows nest possibly a bit premature to call for the concrete canoe but never the less the fact the usual negheads poured out of the woodwork over the course of the last week to mock and disparage the company and it's holders although pointless was hardly surprising?

wonder if 'sirtalks******alot' placed that short...(think we all know the answer to that) :d

Bothered, yes I am absolutely seething 🤣 enjoying a nice cold beer, cheers 🍺

How could a deal be concluded quickly pending a DFS for a gargantuan resource which was only concluded June 23?

At the time of Covid the company in it's present format was 2 decades old? Why would a company operating in such a juristriction suddenly decide to sell quickly (to whom precisley?) without the aforementioned documentation and clarification which may be proven a necessity for a sale.

Besides if it were that obvious as you indicate, why stay invested post covid?

Worthy of a bump :)

It appears China are positioning to clean up in terms of commerce and resources, should be interesting in a decade or so time as to who's wearing the trousers?

'Unless the point is that, if only one asset was announced then there is still material information held by insiders?'

That is how I see it, I personally do not think this sold as 'one lump' and think binding offer(s) would come from more than one party for separate asset(s)?

My opinion, may be wrong we shall see.

Have a nice eve all.

The options won't be exercised without a sale.

The options come up in November (some time) so I would have no doubt will be extended.

Let's say the company announce a sale tomorrow, still needs to be voted on etc this would take time and unlikely.

Most likley if a succesful sale is announced it may be for an asset (oneor more) and a binding offer, which would then need to be voted on.

None of which would be concluded prior to the options extension date?

IMO

'they will allow their chunky options to lapse this time'

Why in the world would they do that if they are set to announce an asset sale?

'Once the BoD has rinsed this dry they'll take it private and screw shareholders.. thats my guess'

The BoD had ample opportunity to perform that trick prior to the new NOMAD announcement and also prior to the recent AR.

'Why is the tax link irrelevant ? It is directly relevant to delayed sale of concentrate ...'

Wasting your time mate these people do not come here to discuss any points relevant.

A website relevant to the Russian ministry of finance tax ammendments is not a creation of the telegram group as I think everyone with semblance of common sense will concur, but don't let it stop another derranged rant :D

https://russia24.pro/361424790/

This is good news for the company and investors as the Russian ministry of finance confirms an ammendment to the tax code which should eliminate a sharp jump in the taxation of mineral extraction.

It's been a disaster on a massive scale with a totally reckless regard to the lives of all concerned by all sides.

Would not be so surprised to see Zelensky shuffled aside and some hastily inadequate agreement cobbled up?