Member Info for TheBeastofBodmin

'it would be very reassuring to hear from EUA BOD'

The AGM was just over 3 weeks ago, did you not attend?

Totally missing the context but never you mind as long as it's negative :D

Have returned with their stupid top up.....b*stds!

I am sure the BoD are perfectly capable of moving the company forwards.

You could however drop them a line and suggest as much or perhaps volunteer your services, after all we have had all sorts here in the past it would appear, mining experts, geologists, business experts.....they all knew what was best too?

I really don't know why they bother, a never ending theme of negativity and conjecture which no one takes seriously?

What an achievement :)

The fact your here posting negative nonsense daily on a company BB your not invested in is enough, there is no need to confirm the obvious?

Good luck to all holders! - 'Honest B1ll' :D

What on earth are you wittering on about now B1ll?

Surely you can spend that hour more productively than wasting your and our time with irrelevant posts here?

That’s 4 but I’ll give you the benefit as I ‘assume’ you meant 2x2? 🤔

'As stated by CS at the AGM!'

The words 'low visibilty' were used in the following RNS Toffers not at the AGM which if you had attended you would well know?

3rd July

RNS Number : 6535E

Yeah but let's be honest B1ll at least he does actually post about the company he invested in.

The non invested have certainly been triggered, wasting more of their time here as usual.

The Russian federation document has been edited what this means we cannot confirm but whatever it's more relevant than 'company won't get a nomad, company will not be able to complete their AR, company needs a raise (last fiscal year)' and a whole host of other story's these grifters have made up over the years.

Not gullible enough to believe any of the garbage you and your fellow mob members have been spouting for the past year or two TC 🤡🤡🤡

Relax, until we know precisley what it's relevance is let it play out to early to jump to conclusions.

That said didn't stop calls talking out of it's derriere again, swiftly followed by TC of course.

These question types are what an investor should research prior to making a decision as to wether to buy shares or not in this company and any other?

DYOR and good luck.

'original buyer didn't actually buy anything' And theres no guaruntee they will, but if they do or someone else does.......

The fact the original buyer is still at the table suggests the emphasis was indeed with BRICS along with the procurement deal with Sinosteel.

Many investors seemed of the opinion NN was the favorite for obvious reasons.

An ii invested a huge amount of money into EUA at an undiscounted SP at the time of 26p a fact bypassed by the mob.

I don't know of saxo trading however EUA is not restricted on any other platform as far as I am aware?

I would contact them for further advice to understand why?

Interesting and debunks a lot of the daily drivel from the mob.

The sanctions have complicated the company's plans, Nesis said on an investor call,

making an asset sale, for which he said there were a number of interested buyers, the only viable option.

"A spin-off or distribution of the subsidiary to investors are not possible given the sanctions regime," Nesis said.

"As much as we are keen to preserve the shareholder value, we are equally keen not to breach any sanctions.

"And therefore, the sale of the Russian business remains the only reasonable option, which we will pursue in the course of the next several quarters."

Six to nine months was a realistic timeframe, he said.

"Management and the BoD are able to extreact substantial if not full value from this business. This will not be a sellout or giveaway"

My understanding is the political situation made the audit more complex and time consuming (but not impossible of course) than normal, Grant Thornton were the auditors.