Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
Why should they? There is likely no plan for them as of yet and to issue an RNS to appease 2 or three bulletin board moaners is probably not on their list of important things to do. You either trust DB or you don't.
There's no way in my opinion that DB will use those shares for any bonus. Institutional investment maybe or perhaps a deal on an asset but he isn't going to be rewarding the directors.
Are those treasury shares worth now? 😉
Traders are trading
The buyers are buying
The sellers are being sapped up by the company
Outcome will be not so easy to day trade, not so easy to buy.
Best part, the idiots will disappear and target other companies who are struggling.
100,000 soaked up?
Yes, even sadder that you would take screen shots of other users posts to use at a future date. You must have a super portfolio to trawl through. How far back does it go?
Ah, great start to the day, trawling back through 100's of posts back to September 2022 to make a comment on a share you don't own. Why don't you polish your 1972 Talbot Express camper up, do something useful rather than useless.
Itsawrap, sorry, I misinterpreted the question. The last RNS stated 15m PLUS, as each of the past ones have. The 'PLUS' could easily be the difference.
My guess would be the sale of the royalties, possibly between 250-300k. DB said they were very happy with the outcome.
Earlier than expected, confirming the Wressle 1 well is still performing and maintaining it's second only to Wytch Farm production position. It would seem the Royalty payment may well have been a lot greater than many have stated, it will be interesting to know the amount when the next results are published. This really is a great, progressive little company and the negativity will diminish as the argument on that is starting to look foolish.
No, I am a shareholder, I am positive and confident in the long term investment I have here. That sets me apart from you lot and I am hardly likely to sit here all day shafting my own investment. You and a few others have no investment here and constantly posting your negative tripe is way beyond your accusations of me being a ramper. Look up 'ramper' you won't find me selling stock on positive news.i happen to believe this company will excel in the long term.
It is rather odd that someone would send virtually every day including weekends posting on a bulletin board of a stock he does not own. There has to be an underlying reason I guess bit we only have one life and it can't be considered healthy, sensible or worthy of the time we are given to waste it is such a way.
When one professes to have a loving wife, a nice form of leisure transport and holidays abroad, to spend even the vacation posting negatively would suggest an underlying hatred of the company or the Management that overrides any common sense.
When you actually look at the contributors here, only about half a dozen post consistent negative comment, regardless of good news, and half of them are not even shareholders.
Of course there is a right to an opinion, but the company has done little wrong over the past few years, when you see it become profitable, debt free, paying dividends and buying back shares, it does set it apart from most of the other small oilers on AIM, yet these people give no credit where credit is due. Most secretly hoping others will lose money here and rubbing their hands with glee when the SP drops a penny of the price pf oil drops. It's pretty sad on their behalf imo.
That was not my point Pboo, what your negative comments do is depress, disillusion and discourage potential investors who may look at various social media platforms before making a decision to buy. Not that they should buy on the cr*p posted here, but it is good to get a feeling of how shareholders are feeling about the company and their investment. Anyone reading your comments would think you had been robbed blind by Union Jack and nothing they could say or do would be to the advantage of shareholders. So yes, you possibly do affect the SP in your own little way.
Oh, my, is Pboo your real name then? 😮
Pboo, you think I am a bully lol? What do you think i feel about you, constantly being negative on a share you don't own, potentially causing unrest and dissension which leads to genuine shareholders potentially losing money?
You are far worse than any bully, of which I am certainly not. I have a family that would certainly testify to that.
No, you are pretty low doing what you do, FACT
Nothing wrong with a bit of fun Milrnow, Pboo deserves a poke with his repetitive, daily negative share buy back post.
UKOG, your favourite stock, need a 2000 to one consolidation Pboo, a 200 to one would be laughable and buying back shares lol, with what? They will never do that because they will never be able to. 😂
No, let's see those 5,000,000 shares worth treble their cost 😀
Pboo, on the other hand he may well be keeping them knowing their value will double or even treble in the short to medium term. Of course, in your eyes it would be the negative opinion lol.
Allow me to explain-
Yesterday, prior to the North Kelsey RNS, there was some buying. Not a lot but enough to give the SP a 5% rise.
Bearing in mind, the North Kelsey news was due in the next 10 days or so and whilst a positive outcome was hoped for, it was not necessarily the news of the year.
Pboo seems to think the news of an early RNS was leaked to a few and they bought in expecting good news.
However, the hearing hadn't even been convened so there was hardly likely to be any good news in the RNS on this asset, but Pboo seems to think that people bought expecting good news.
Now, logically, it it was leaked as he suggests, those in receipt of that leak would also know it was negative but Pboo suggests they didn't know and piled in expecting something positive.
There weren't exactly a rush of substantial buys so those buying in on bad news weren't many.
This must have been the most exciting leak of all time causing a buying storm on bad news.
His view is pretty ridiculous, like his views on the share buy-backs that are and will be beneficial to shareholders, of which he is not one.