RE: Presentation7 Dec 2022 09:00
My overall impression lies on the positive side in the sense that it continued to present Synairgen's case for investment to an informed audience. IMHO, the company should limit Dr. Monk's role to scientific presentations at high level conferences, as has been the case recently. Synairgen needs a more confident speaker with an engaging personality when participating in discussion groups. Conversations at this level require individuals who have both the personality ethic, as well as the work ethic. Dr Monk's commitment to Synairgen's conference presentation programme in recent months shows that he possesses the latter in abundance, but was out of his comfort zone yesterday. IMHO, Synairgen made a similar wrong choice in the P2 Home webinar, and should have profited from that experience.
I remain optimistic about Synairgen's future prospects although time is getting on, and it is important for the company to achieve a P3 equivalent trial invitation in the coming few months.
I am grateful for the recent comments from regular investors on this forum, which have added to my knowledge and understanding, as always. I would respectfully respect that the obvious trolls are ignored. They add nothing to the conversation.
GLA.