Member Info for The.Italian

whilst completely understanding and sympathising with the general air of despondency pervading the board for the last few days stemming largely from the realisation of the current isa timeline,i do still the one comfort from one thing and that is the current market cap of approximately 52,000,000 sterling.whilst i am sceptical of valuations placed on the listing itself of 40 cents if we took just 25%of the suggested listing value it means in simple terms that regents other assets are currently valued at about 30 cents a share or about 28,000,000 sterling.even if we take a very pessimistic view of the australian irs situation and assume that regent have to pay the full alleged liability and that the holding in venturex is insufficient to frank the same (hard to see how such a large holding could be realised in practice without crashing the share price) we still seem to be left with a very low value for a potential treatment for many millions of people even without the use.i suppose it will all come down to sales but i don't see how we would need sales of an enormous magnitude to support a value of at least 60 to 80 cents a share which is where i hope this will be in the next year or so.these are just the musings of a LTH and is obviously very simplistic in their analysis.The thoughts of other more knowledgable posters would be welcome

10% up on nasdaq better day here today level 2 looking positive

sadly the latter just suffering from soubriquet aspiration.

good to see your enthusiasm determination and sense of humour remain undiminished keep it up!

as a long term holder who doesn't post very often but who has always enjoyed bignoses posts and the influence they have had in maintaining interest on this board i would just like to add my good wishes for a speedy return to full health

IG is this a level of incidence greater than previously believed to apply or is it saying that in effect this is the first reliable study to indicate the perceived level?your comments would be greatly appreciated.

i do hope you are correct and i understand and respect your reasoning here but lack of substantial shareholder notification and recent sp movements are not overly supportive .we have speculated that there are entries who would not be overly troubled by the substantial shareholder reporting requirements and this may well be correct but only time will tell.i do accept that it is difficult to come up with a convincing alternative explanation so let us hope you are proved right at the end of the day

.when pomander expresses this level of disenchantment albeit in humorous terms i am getting seriously worried .if it were not for the very faint element of positivity i detected at the end of alquemies post yesterday i would have given up all hope! on a serious level i continue to hope that the potential here will ultimately justify the long and arduous path we have been travelling

interesting series of buys in latter part of day.some sells also of course but may be an indication of an interesting day tomorrow.

it appears the persistent seller is still here .30000,30000,50000.seems strange if we are on the brink of a rerate although they could well be in a significant profit situation already and simply safeguarding substantial gains.

at least they have confirmed receipt of the first payment let us hope for further good news in due course

many thanks for feedback much appreciated and very encouraging

admission date now scheduled for 26/3/18

admission date now scheduled for 26/3/18

has all gone very quiet re the Sipo scheduled for friday.does anyone know if it has been put back again?

has all gone very quiet here. does anyone know if it has been put back again?

perhaps not so interesting after all. its followed by an identical deletion.

700000 shares just bought .Interesting!

im afraid i have to agree with pom that a dividend is very unlikely for the foreseeable future.im sure funds will be needed for continuing development and of course there is the potential for possible use re viagra/cialis failure which is presumably going to require significant funding if RP seek to explore this further.

bignose thanks for the clarification re ireland.yes bit strange but agree probably reconsidered due to numbers.good to hear that recordati have a priority list rather than a scattergun approach.