Member Info for The.Italian

pom

that is an interesting observation.i did wonder if it was a "bot"although only because one of mind seemed onltto have the first three letters of thefrench word for apple as its possible basis for removal but presumably bots work at weekends so probably not.whatever the source of censorship it is very strange.this has just given me an idea see next post

not in haydale and never have been but was in vrs until recently.not negative on vrs at all but just taken profits and re-evaluatedrisk/reward profile.just read your friday 00.57 post and think it sums matters up admirably.hope you don't mind me saying so

good to see this highlighting "tremendous". nice positive presentation

good to see some rational well balanced and knowledgeable posts this morning .

agreed I'm sure they will have been given an optimistic assessment of the prospects and bought in on that basis but they may regard disappointed expectations as par for the course.of course there is always the possibility that they have a slightly greater depth of knowledge about how matters are progressing than we do (ear to the ground so to speak) and may be perfectly relaxed.let us hope it is this latter scenario .i really do hope we hear something about hk and mcau in the very near future. cheers

the problem with placees is they quite often don't seem that bothered by subsequent share price performance.i may be entirely wrong and certainly if i was a placee and down 25% i would be up in arms,but participation in the placing seems in part simply a function of the market mutual back scratching and quid pro quo ethos. you take part in this and next time ill take part in yours etc.i may be wrong but i don't feel thereis great deal of shareholder activism from placees out there.dont rock the boat sort of thing.hope I'm wrong and they are jumping up and down outside jamies office with placards demanding their money back perhaps they are just taking a long term view?

right gibson emailed and response awaited

thanks bignose thats fine.just wanted to be sure i wasnt going mad.i will email jamie over weekend .all very odd!

bignose i expect you are now asleep but in the morning you will find that your post repeating gibsons response to the usa trial recruitment question has been deleted.im talking about the one from 12.40 on the28th.i was about to compose an e mail to gibson and wanted to check your wording.i couldn't believe it has gone.am i mistaken ?
i still intend to email him but will see what you say first.i find all this very troubling (hope I'm not overreacting) what can they(whoever they are)be worried about?even if the information given was wrong or mistaken we are not actually going to do anything about it in practice so why the paranoia?my real concern is that there really is some problem with the us process which they are frightened to disclose hope i am wrong

am i imagining it or did my post mentioning an absent former poster just get removed. it was merely a mildly jocular reference to the fate that might await pikey pete if he wasnt careful . if so please think very carefully before posting anything to do with pomegranates !

small uncrossing at 35.5p completely agree with Jimzis comments

for the sake of balance only a small trade but still very good sign

36p paid

hope i am not but it really does feel it may have turned

looking very strong indeed now.34.45 on the bid and good quantity!

yes looking strong now.did i briefly see 34p on the bid?very encouraging

thank you alquemie appreciate the further comment.did wonder about it being a single centre but I've no experience of this sort of thing in practice. will probably enquire direct of jamie in its instance to see what he says

thanks bignose just felt it polite to check with you

sorry to be a paini bignose but just so i can be sure of my facts before i e mail the company you are kindly saying that you had a response from jamie on or about the 25th august as per your 12.40 post today.i have looked back to25th and following few days but i suspect the detail was in your post setting out his response to your 9 point questions which i think was deleted.if thats the case it may be no more than a simple failure to update the site and if so i would expect him to confirm that if i take it up.are you happy for me to quote the wording from your post? i would not mention its source