Member Info for Techtonic

Cheers, OAPk :o)

Yep, sold today , 50% on this. Didn't have that much in though. Sold on spike in last 15 mins.

Shame you've left the Ciz board. Come back . It's good for the board having you there.

Looks to me like historical (especially in the jars) to exemplify potential.

Could do with clarifying really

...and into the sunset he rides

Hi Oapk,

I hope you’re ok and the last few days messages aren’t a reflection of something going on in your personal life.

I’d really like to understand you a little better to get a truer grasp on your posts. I’m puzzled by the reference to “veiled threats”. Where were the veiled threats in the posts this morning? Could you explain that one please?

On the other subject of the Fundraise, and since everything has been confirmed as being Kosher, what was going on there? It would be honourable for you to admit being wrong over this; at least a reference to it/ explanation?

Reasons that have passed through my mind are:

1) Genuine scepticism that the Fundraise happened, cemented in your mind by no RNS update and Voting rights not being listed pronto.

2) Feeling that you beat the system (and those ‘cheerleaders’ on here) by selling at a profit - and an attendant “I showed you” attitude.

3) Simply wanting to buck the trend of unbridled positivity on this forum; becoming an outlier with a loud contrarian voice.

4) Belief that some posters on here are linked to Ciz and you dislike the ‘kudos’ attached to their posts.

5) You’re a disruptor; you like it, and why not. A hand grenade thrown now and again shakes everyone out of their ramping cosiness.

6) You were trying to lower the share price to buy in lower.

7) Other aspects of your personal life have fed into your behaviour on here.

Anyway..I think you’ve been a valuable voice on the forum, and I don’t care if you’re a bit “out there” , a maverick, mercurial or just a bit weird!

Ps I said you were ‘obtuse’…although difficult to comprehend sometimes, you’re certainly no thicky. I meant oblique. Apologies; wrong word.

Total Voting Rights by month end.

Wait and see

I refer you to my previous message.

You're obtuse at the best of times. I have just telephoned them and talked to John Depasquale - the fundraising HAS happened, he confirmed. and it's a pure bookkeeping situation about sharelist.

Wait and see.

I've just spoken to John Depasquale at Allenby Capital - and he has confirmed the fundraising " has gone through cleanly with no issues at all".

OAPk...you're losing my respect

Cheers Green/Brond

Mr OAPk.. I'm with you on not following a positive mantra without question, but your postings have taken on a glib, self-satisfied flavour since you sold (most).

Bit naughty really, and certainly an unseemly characteristic, as you weren't even prepared to answer your own question.

So reading between the lines of your ever -cryptic teasing ! I'm guessing that Allenby called you to offer more shares because they didn't have the full take up?

For heavens sake, just cut the BS and say, man!

Can't do with all this cognitive meandering, teasing and one-upmanship.

If you've got something to say just say it!

Tu es un provocateur, Monsieur OAPk!

In context, yes I would believe you if you said Allenby called - depending on your background and previous investment scale, that's how brokers work.

I know quite a few people on the brokers circuit from a few years ago.

So, if you said that, and using quite upfront (if a little oblique at times) , then I would believe you.

Why would I say I'd called Bill Behnke if I hadn't? I've said I got nothing basically. There appears to be only one person who knows he was in the Cayman Islands ..me. Call him or TM and ask about this for verification.

Calling people like that is no skin off my nose since I interviewed about 50,000 people over 17 years. It's a phone number, you ring it, and someone answers. Simple.

The only trick is the confidence to do it.

Green... I think what OAPk is hinting at is that Allenby may not have had the take up and could cancel it under their terms.

OAPk for clarity. Have you called Allenby and , of so, what was the answer?

Cheers

Hi OAPk..yes, I get what you're saying about the 'mantra' on here, but I'm taking it you haven't called Allenby capital yourself?

Direct question OAPk..

Have you called Allenby up about this or are you speculating ?

(I did call them up early last week but no one answered- and I didn't follow up on it, got caught up in other stuff.. however that was to discuss more general things

Ok chaps. Fair points.

I still have quite a chunk of shares, but I had too many for my own comfort.

As far as conversations , Green, I think we're on different wavelengths here. I always learn something from every conversation.

And if I have a thousand conversations and only learn a snippet from each, then the sum of the parts can be significant. Plus I enjoy talking to people and learning from people.

Anyway all I can say is that is my experience, and I was successful in my realm. Other people have their own talents and experience, but I'd always say be open-minded in every conversation you have.

Ah ..oapk..comprende...will have a read.

Sorry everyone for off topic . Last one.

Go on, Oapk..

Just seen your Melon comment...brain not attuned yet! Think I need more literal explanation..der

I “expected” that reply, Green!

If I had a penny for every time I’ve heard the phrase: “What’s the point, you’ll never get anywhere, no chance.” I’d be a very rich man.

Expectation limits outcome. I’ve had some great success in the past with “impossible” conversations.

It’s not just the words, but the tone and possibility the subject branches out into new territory.

Eg. Maybe I could have picked up something from him being in a Board meeting in the Cayman Islands. What company? Why there? That time. Then you can jigsaw build a picture.

I once had a conversation with a CEO who sounded extremely flat on the phone, and I ‘felt’ something was wrong. He quit that week. Did he actually tell me anything? No. But I learned something v important from his voice alone.

Is it “likely” I’d learn anything from Bill Behnke? I don’t know. Maybe BB would have talked more if he hadn’t called Ciz. Could I have reported on anything he might have said? I don’t know. But at least it may have been educational. And at least I tried.

The company has proven itself to be loose with the truth, it’s just shafted shareholders with an unexpected fundraise, 15% revenue has slipped to 10% , timescales are way off, still “negotiating” MOU, China pushed back.

But Brondby’s buying more, Green is just as positive, Jace , I assume, is still in Poundland fantasy land. And I assume Neil has now settled into a new positivity.

It just appears (to me) that you’re mostly acting contrary to the information before your eyes.

I have no idea where/when this is going now. Could be extremely good, could be very bad. All depends on the Behnke deal , timescales and the reagents/clinical trials data.

Pop across to REDX . I've left you a message

This is being delisted May, the news bombed the share price, but CEO now used that to buy 30k.

These shares before de-listing have a tendency to bounce big, possibility of doubling or more.

( Ps forgive me everyone - Oapk ..also have a look at ECR - looks to have found gold in substantial quantities for the first time to poss begin commercial open pit. Gold high as ever. 0.6- 1p on cards (Doc holliday director - that works both ways)

Hi Vinc..

Just a bit of background here.

At 11.30pm GMT Thursday 14 March, I cold called Bill Behnke (I was amazed that his present phone number and his past ones are quite easily found on the internet)

It's difficult trying to gain traction from a cold call - but I used to do it a lot in a past life. He seemed friendly enough and told me he was in the Cayman Islands on business and to call back the next day at 4 p.m. (GMT).. (Cayman islands 5 hours behind)

Although he was taken aback, he seemed quite amiable , and I thought he would expand on his initial two minutes conversation.

Between those two phone calls he called Ciz and Tim Metcalfe etc told him to shut shop. The next day I had a text off Bill behnke saying he was in a board meeting, but then sent me a general text - similar to his tweet about Ciz , saying he could not say anything more because of NDAs and confidentiality agreements.

I was pretty annoyed because when I then called Ciz they told me "you can't speak to Bill Behnke..you can't do this and that..."

I can talk to anyone who I like if I find their phone number, Ciz!!

Now I can't say anymore about these high valued investors but I think I would have got a bit further if Ciz hadn't shut it down.

I'm only speculating that Bill Behnke probably knows lots of HVI outside his firm , due to his connections. I'm guessing they have very big pockets - and they will need to to develop this, so they must see huge potential for profits.

But the overall picture I got was that Ciz are absolutely determined to control debate, control the agenda and only release news when they like it. (And that doesn't always appear to marry with when an RNS should officially be released)

And I don't like that.