Member Info for Techtonic

Ps Highland.

The science is NOT yet proven.

It needs clinical trials to reveal that

Do you know whether the money has landed?

Highlandmatt.

This isn't about the science.

This is about an agreement and a contract.

Whether the money comes, reveals the confidence in the science.

If the money doesn't come and the agreement isn't made, Ciz is cornered.

So first things first. Still waiting for Tim Metcalfe to get back (maybe he's cheesed off by all the negative reaction - of people losing cash -because Ciz told porkies)

Like I said the setting up of time-frames and expectation by using video comms has a short time frame.

Without hard news , it sets an agenda that it can be traded.

And by hinting at widespread good grades at bulk sampling, this can set up for failure also .

I think the BOD - while enthusiastic and pro active - are a bit naive with this. The market obviously only wants to see hard evidence now.

Could do with the BOD learning a few lessons and surprising to the positive.

It's playing a poker hand with all the cards face up.

Expectation - tax losses/JV/ high grades etc creates disappointment in the vacuum of news

Right, the company can't have it both ways here.

I'm going to call Tim Metcalfe and ask if we've received the $100K.

If Tim says he can't comment because it's material news , then it needs an RNS by definition.

If it's 'not material news' he can tell me.

Tim reads these boards, so expect a call/text soon Tim.

You can't have it both ways.

Oh lord...Mornington's here! Earl of Aim will be turning up next.

Ojls - remember when we were talking about value and share price a few months ago.

I still think that LST is suffering from the same problem: they're definitely on the right track and business is building, but there doesn't seem to be a catalyst for a re-rate.

It's very softly softly catchee monkey, which is pretty good but I can't see where the huge advances in share price are coming from. Maybe the cumulative effect of growing revenue will hit a critical mass.

I'm still a little uncertain whether they will need a fundraise or whether revenue is now self-funding them

Comms..haha! Indeed Morpheus.

Regarding the "risks", that's just bog standard stuff listed with all these companies.

Cheers Neil for that 'non-confirmation confirmation' !

I would expect you to have been asked.. and I appreciate you 'answering' the question. You didn't have to, so thanks for the comments.

As I said in the early days I relied too much on other posters.

The problem with having very high value investors commenting as yourself is that it's chicken and egg. (They're certainly will be some at least subliminal confirmation bias even if you're not aware of it)

But by having such a large amount in, it is extremely difficult to assess news from a neutral position.

You're either so convinced by the company and tech that you plough huge amounts of money in to back it, or you've ploughed souch in, it's hard to reverse that mindset.

I've always found your posts extremely informative, but I do see your large investment as a stumbling block to clear vision.

I'll still look forward to reading your posts , as they're always interesting and well thought out, but it took a while to suss out that you know little more than anyone else, just with bigger pockets! ;o)

I always look forward to reading from Vincent, Brond and Green, Brondby even old Poundland Jace - also erstwhile OAPk..

However, there's been many an enlightening moment, like when Brond said Ciz had all the cards Vs US investors! Hmm

Still liking reading everyone, and enjoying the posts (but large amounts of salt are now applied to the meal)

Well, I don't know about that.

Let's put some perspective on this.

$100K is approx £80K..

I would think that Neil has three times that amount in, and I nearly had that amount in too !

If they're bothered about interest on a few days on 80k, there's not much confidence is there?

If they're waiting for some test results before investing, maybe, but if it's to do with a few quid interest, I'm not impressed.

If Neil is watching, I did ask a question which was ignored a few days ago.

To Neil: As a high level investor, were you asked to be involved in the £600k fundraise?

If you were, obviously you knew it was coming during comments. Perfectly reasonable and within the rules not to be able to say anything.

I'm just interested whether you were asked to participate and whether you did?

Thanks

Cheers, Dan.

I've been investing since the late '90s, but not talking about overall Market insight etc.

Just curious about this specifically and wondered if you had any knowledge other than a subjective feeling.

I think there's some churn of fundraise shares still, and pretty convinced that there will be a bounce to at least 0.4p based on closing the gap at some stage fairly soon.

Thanks for the reply

Interesting..

Just a couple of questions Dan

Do you "believe there is strong intention to get it down to 0.24 because of new knowledge, or simply on past behaviour?

And, if that's the case, and you fervently believe that, why don't you sell now and buy in at 0.24p?

It is a typical stock to be traded and being labelled "a punters' favourite" doesn't help.

I also agree that, although continual video news updates are good for Comms, it also has a flip side - everyone then knows the time scales and what is expected..

And when everyone knows what is expected they know how to trade it.

Could do with some really good hard news that takes things to the next level, like Tax RNS, unexpected good grades in volume, and or JV/ collaboration with bigger company.

Thanks for that, Talking Sense.

I don't do telegram groups..for the reason you stated (and I don't like closed hierarchical groups/cliques.

Yep, it's a murky world out there !

No chance you'd be doge for libel with such a benign comment.

Seems pointless putting it on a on a forum if you're not going to explain it.

Those who know, know already, and it's meaningless to everyone else

For the uneducated, who's Dave Burton?

We should get a confirmation receipt RNS of the 100K.. and I think some posters on here have confirmed that earlier.

Regarding the next RNS.

Who knows what that may be... I would hope for a few (good) surprises, but with Ciz who knows.

Let's hope they got the message about comms.

Caveat is that the phrase "Rapid" in Ciz World can mean anything, and could do with 100K coming through rapido.

Nice find LB. I like the bit at the end.

"Philippe Funfrock, CEO of ProteoGenix, said, "Our partnership exemplifies the significant progress that can be made when innovative technologies and shared goals come together in the fight against cancer."

As this blood test advances toward U.S. clinical trials and AIMS FOR RAPID COMMERCIALISATION, this collaboration sets a new industry standard in the fight against lung cancer.

Ps but what I love most is that someone can be called 'Funfrock' Phillipe Funfrock. Sounds like a happy guy : o)

You only have to look at his MO on every share he jumps into with unbridled ramping (sigh).

Surprised anyone still falls for it. Got to admire his tenacity. Some he wins, many he loses.

Still, that's not to say there's promise here. Could be a good year for RUA.

Traders would be lucky to achieve that profit last few days/week..maybe 0.3 to 0.32.

However, wish I could draw a chart on here because, you are quite right Dan, it's getting tighter.

This is going to break out sharply within the next 4 trading days, imo..

Still believe it's placement shares being churned