Member Info for Teacup64

Dodge - Cool. Yep, that definetly sounds like my questions, or some of them anyway. I'll post my full questions and their responses when the Q&A is uploaded and listened too. Thanks.

Hes definetly happy with the key points that have been shared over this BB today, and I will let you know if it does get to the bottom of the options issue ;)

FAHP - I will have a listen when it's uploaded. I did notice you mention that it went over your head, so no worries, I wasn't expecting anybody to be a messenger for me. But otherwise, good updates this morning. I'm hoping they have been answered, it just made it hard to determine whether they had been with several of the responses made today by different posters.

Dodge - In short, they were all related to APs proposal of options, and what his intentions are, if, and when they are converted.

Supergar - Missed your post then. I'm waiting for the upload, but from the updates posted on the BB, it does sound like they may have been touched on. But I get the impression that some were side skirted....from the feedback posted here anyway.

...I want to know if he's answered my 4 questions, or whether he's avoided them....guess I'll have to wait and see!

Isas, you missed your opportunity, you should have asked that in the Q&A ;) On a serious note, I reckon it'll be this evening sometime, latest tomorrow.

Hi MorningSun, I couldn't work out what you were saying in your post....could you say it again please.

Hmmmm....my 4 questions haven't been answered yet.....Let's hope he does!

...but yet they failed to provide that apparent vast amount of data they gathered....so much data was it they collected, that the test still needs to be rerun! Furthermore, what do they mean by success? .....how can the RF success be if they still need to test? .....it amounts to saying that it simply switches on, that's it! It sounds more like that they are attempting to lubricate the upcoming placing with immaterial statements in an attempt to boost the price before dilution hits. Just my opinion.

Ross,

"Weird conspiracy theories"?!?

Did you know, a conspiracy is not as uncommon as you make out, whilst your attempting to discredit users who point fingers at you and your comrades hidden agenda.

Type into Google "Conspiracy UK courts".....You will find millions of results relating to convictions of all sorts of conspiracies......as "weird" as you make them out to be, many were proved to be correct!

Agreed Burnie.

Go out and get laid or something! ......If you meet a girl and go back to her place to find a Soviet Union banner hung on her wall....That's definetly a big red flag!

Ross - I vaguely remember that to drill within SWP, it would cost several million. I also remember that as part of the Steeldrum deal, we would be given priority on the rig, at preferential rates. ....Do you mind telling us all how much those rates are, as I'm not able to find it written anywhere and can't work out if it will easily fit within our budget for SWP when that day arrives? ....And whilst your at it, could you also provide any information that relates to shallow SWP wells not producing well, without referring to Goudron declines as they are most likely very different geologically. Thanks.

That was funny ;)

Besides, copyright only applies to documents within the domain, which once expired means it's free for public use.....Copyright is pointless for VAST as the idea is to publish and promote, rather than restrict.

But talk about sharp eyed ;)

Of course Ross knows best, he's our no.2 ramper.

Hahahaha. Woodaldo, brilliant answer ;)

Dodge - That's what I'm thinking too!

Yrab - I missed your original post and we've crosswired...I know you weren't thinking that ;)

Sandy - For my brothers sake, where I will inevitably benefit as well, let's hope he's gonna smash everyones 2018 Xmas expectations ;)

Yrab, Missed your post there, hi. That is a plausible theory now you mention it, but I still somehow think that December may be the month that AP fires news out on several fronts, which preparation has delayed the announcement of A3 results. Hey, it's only a view and I could be wrong, but let's just hope I'm right....although I don't yet hold any shares!

I just can't realistically see that gathering figures from both Rom & Zim should take as long as they did to gather, even if they were excellent results. It's simply extracting data from one corporate system and entering that data to an RNS, with the addition of other words to fill gaps.

I don't buy the theory of AP somewhat hiding the results by delaying them, as there is no conceivable motive to do so, and its impact would be detrimental to the shareprice.

I honestly feel that the delay had something to do with the fact that he has been far too busy, and with such a small team, is ambitiously juggling perhaps way too much, within the timeframes he set.....busy doing what we will have to wait and see, but the former reason doesn't offer a better answer. Again, just my opinion.