Member Info for Teacup64

WTF!!! ....I only ever tell Ross to do one, and post stupid jokes!

For Monday's announcement about the XTR & Omnia partnership !! ...Well, the in-house feasibility results should have at least been gathered and compiled anyway. It was due to be complete by Nov, so I'm hopeful of an announcement being made on Monday, or this week atleast....although there was no mention of it being released by a certain time. Come on Colin, show us the money!...and the Mozambique taxman, whose people are probably starving by now, due to lack of revenue from the license they issued us! ;) Onwards & Upwards.

Thanks Peter ;) BigMJ - ...and quite a large extra addition to add to the list of sticky fingered folk too. ;)

ORT & Sandy - The question of exact percentages I've started checking up myself, I'll get back when I'm done as well, tonight though, I'm definitely done. Sandy - I see what you mean about needing some time to compile the info....I've just got through 2015 RNSs....! ;) Have a good weekend all!

This just got really awkward....

Look, less the "CEO" part, I have to support Robs view as its principle points are my view too. So thanks for the support Rob.

However, to avoid any post treaty tension and awkwardness, I will do as I said and drop the matter until more information is provided. I'm debated out!

Someone else joined in at 20:11!

Without patting my own back too much, I thought that was quite a catchy name ;)

Lol. We'll consider your 19:55 post as mutual acceptance of the the 'SandyTea' Peace Treaty ;)

Look, I currently have an issue with the 'options', and until we hear any other news regarding it, I consider the matter already debated, and happy to shelf it as a result. I never posted today to start anything other than post what I considered a rather positive post...forgetting any misinterpretations. I updated the posts midway through writing this, and glad I did. FWIW, I was also about to write up a peace treaty, for our own, and everyone else's benefits. I have to admit, I was ****ed when I read the first paragraph, lol. Hey, consider all issues between us forgotten.

Sorry, this was the post I was meant to send... "Hi Teacup, Okey-doke. You've made a pretty steady effort to get this one "on the table", so to speak. I'm personally quite happy to engage. FWIW, I write as a periodic shareholder here - mostly holding since August 2016 but currently out and circling at a speed/altitude Vulture setting of Near-Term Dive. Anyone who *isn't* a recent BB arrival will probably know me pretty well as a long-term poster. Much more often in than out. Also, I know Andrew a little bit personally. So you have a big beef, I think, that Andrew wants to get paid a whack and has had Board approval to set that up. Okay. Sharp eyes. Marks and credit for that. Can certainly be a great quality among shareholders and (if lucky) on a BB to get such input. I haven't had time to evaluate your core grudge, as it were, but it sounds like it's worth revisiting the paperwork. But my preliminary questions are these: 1) You say (I think) Zagra 10% and assume (I think) 10% across the board. I think actually it's much more varied across assets. Are you just extrapolating on a quick look in from Zagra? 2) How do you imagine Vast pays for the assets it acquires? Land is property, etc. Who do you imagine owns what? 3) What proportion of the value of the company do you think is due to the personal efforts of Andrew Prelea. Do you think he's a passably decent functionary of no great personal merit who is easily replaced by an advert in the local county paper, or do you think he's a guy who has built this company's present value and future potential to a very great extent? Get back to me with some answers there and I'll be happy to keep the conversation going. Cheers, Sandy".

Sandy - It'll be great to see what you find. Hopefully, it can resolve the underlying issue raised. Thanks.

Unlike Ian, it was you proposed the challenge remember, and failed to commit to your end of conversing thereafter. Here, this may jolt your memory.... "Hi Teacup, I think there's a bit more I could say on (1), and I know there's a fair bit more I could say on (3). But your biggest gap of knowledge - sorry, no insult, I think a widespread big gap of knowledge - concerns (2). **** "2) How do you imagine Vast pays for the assets it acquires? Land is property, etc. Who do you imagine owns what?" ...Not really catching what your saying or asking there, or the point your trying to make I'm afraid? **** This isn't something I can get into now in detail, but I'd hope to come back to it at some point. What I should say in a nutshell, though, is that - to the best of my knowledge - certain key VAST assets were acquired by VAST at a time when the company itself simply did not have the money to acquire them. I think a dimension that has perhaps been overlooked is the degree to which private individuals (now on the Board) were prepared to put their personal money at risk, in crucial deals that went through primarily in the company name, with their own part remaindered as a margin. I leave this open, because I am not party to all the facts. But I believe this is public domain if you dig about. Cheers, Sandy" So, now we're clear of that matter, I'm not to bothered, you can challenge any point I make, when you feel you want to ;)

Sorry that you were dragged into this again, but as I said before, you were never the problem. I do recognise that you stepped away, rather than challenge what I said. But again, I apologise.

Indeed, but tbf, I do find him quite an interesting character. I'm sure he'll forget about the past sooner or later, and then we can all just get along and enjoy the good times.....5-10p parties soon ;)

That is one comprehensive list Peter! You can add Teacup @ 562,000 if you like. Nice work!

Sandy - that old chestnut is it ;)

"Might do some weekend reading"....you'll probably be to busy on here defending your pride ;)

Victim?!? ....I got jumped and still kicked your ass, lol. So no victim here buddy!

Sounds like you can't let go of the past Sandy, even though you said this was getting boring! Lol. Learn your post history first Sandy If I was you ;)

"I wonder which parts of my post you'll actually reply to :)" ...all of them actually Pecten ;)