Member Info for TalkingSense

Lol.......I don't know what's going on , but I would be absolutely amazed if we go for less 'bang for your buck' drilling in Victoria this year on an accelerated timescale which would cost more.....does not fit with Mike's stated intentions.

Also I'm pretty sure someone posted a comment from the original change of board RNS that showed AH has indeed left the company (which I admit is a pity from a geology advisory point of view).

But hey, you keep pushing your wishful thinking....don't let evidence get in the way.

FFS Tamer....You're not going to start with Curveball doc now are you (said in jest)

There is no evidence that there will be any drilling this year (and the required timeline and fact that Creswick drilling is not the most cost effective makes it exceptionally unlikely) so your "don't rule anything out" seems more in hope than expectation

Because they have said that they won't be doing any groundwork in Victoria until December and there are currently no identified drill targets...It'll take more than 4 weeks to identify, plan and drill.

IG...What makes you think there will be drilling in Victoria this year?

I see we have another 4.5m buys come in after 3pm again

Correction....I don't expect any drilling this year

Hi Mental,

I certainly don't expect any drilling this month.

AJ did state that his aim on Lolworth was to have drilling targets identified in Lolworth in January which would mean that there will be no drilling there until the end of the wet season at the arliest (April from memory- happy to be corrected)

As for plans for the Blue Mountain, Tambo, Baillieston, Creswick , Hurricane, Lolworth, Itagon, property and rigs......It's all speculation and guesswork until the 'review' is complete and we get an update from the company on the way forward.

I would be surprised if we don't look to offload one or some of those projects (Tambo & Baillieston to go would be my guess), the property and either sell of lease out the rig.

Once we have the strategy then we can make informed decisions on if we want to sell/buy/hold in the future of ECR.

And as for the 'new' posters....yes some will come and go quickly and and some will hang around.....it has always be thus (that sounded almost philisophical ;-)

Of course Legal you are assuming that the new investors are looking to flip the shares for a quick profit rather than keep the shares as a mid-long term investment.

Obviously no evidence either way although Mike did say that the new investors had 'sticky hands' and were looking to keep hold of the shares for the long term..........Your worry holds if you believe that to not be true (we will find out in time).

C0.4p if you are looking at a asset+cash per share calculation (and yes, its not how the SP works as you need to factor in confidence, potential, future risks and opportunities, etc).

From a pure asset point of view it looks undervalued at the current SP

Legal, Sounds like a good idea ...He's filtered as he adds nothing and is just bitter with his 1.5 average.

I'll keep Snip off the filtered list , although he is a pessimistic so and so he does validate his misery with theories.

....and he has won post of the day when he replied to IG this morning:

"The more you post, the more I'm put off."......Like you were keen to buy back in Snip ;-)........made me chuckle

No , you're just stifling any meaningful discussion on the board.

Have you bought back in after your 30% in week loss trades last week?

Or are you waiting for it to go back to 0.2 by the end of the day as you were predicting this morning?

Notrex, Try a change of tact and actually post about ECR on the ECR board.

The repeated personal insults aimed at every other poster are getting a bit tiresome

Legal,

Snip/ Notrex and some other posters on here are pushing that narrative (mostly 'old' posters).

Notrex, FYI , I was again being sarcastic as no-one actually knows so I am not supporting that narrative.

I'm assuming that a TR1 will have to be issues for the new investors so we will get to see who they are.

Legal, According to some all those shares have/will be forward sold well before the GM.

Of course there is the possibility that the new investors are actually investors and will look to keep them for a long term return.

Snip,

That's what Doc/Mike has said in the interview that they will do exactly that post review so they have committed to exactly that.

they need to show that they have learned from the past and will set realistic timescales/targets ....better to under promise and over deliver

Or they could have just bought in and want to make a profit?

Obviously there is no evidence either way

Snip, I make it 9m buys and 400k sells since 3pm yesterday

"Did not want to over dilute"....ffs phone typing letting me down again :-(

Https://youtu.be/ytLjtMkWWIU?si=gwRDAsd8_Cx8XRA8

"We could have raised a lot more than £580k" but were aware that we dud not want to Iver dilute the shares.

I was being sarcastic when I said I was £100k's down....lol

Shows that you are completely gullible and will believe anything that suits you....pmsl