RE: If SMR positive!2 May 2025 23:23
Dusty,
I see your point, but I’d push back on the idea that reform is necessarily an obstacle. It can be a strategic advantage—especially in the context of shifting energy alliances and national security concerns. Reform signals adaptability, transparency, and future-readiness, which are exactly the traits many countries—Scandinavian and beyond—value in long-term partnerships.
Yes, there are historical frictions, particularly with some Southern European states, but energy security has a way of recalibrating priorities. The Scandinavian nations, as you mentioned, already share deep cooperation with us in energy and maritime sectors. They’re more likely to assess reform pragmatically—on how it strengthens the UK's role as a reliable, modern partner—rather than dismissively based on transient political posturing.
As for leadership under Starmer or even Farage, foreign governments tend to distinguish between political noise and structural capacity. If reform enhances regulatory alignment, investment climate, or technological edge—especially in areas like SMRs, grid balancing, or hydrogen—it will be seen as a net positive, not a hindrance.