Member Info for SurreyNot123

MTL would press on into production, we'd keep pur shares.

It wouldn't change a huge amount tbh, it would be the same as if we just started producing with JM as a maj shareholder, though in his place would be MTL.

Thanks SJ.

Though last night would indicate decorum is out the window. If he feeds back do let us know. If this rhe start of the end I'd like to know which side of the fence were landing on. I've got 2% of this company, would love to see break even, would be ecstatic to turn an actual profit after all these years.

Fact?

You heard from the mothership?

Interesting seeing some of the old faithfuls over at MTL.

Screw this deal - it's terrible for CNR LTHs.

They would for sure be getting a huge deal, but JM is effectively doing nothing and saddling holders with the bag holding for another company because he's failed to generate the right value himself.

My opinion is that he's just gotten sick to the back teeth with this and wants to wash his hands of it.

33p equiv would put me at 28% loss on over 4million shares. A hugely bitter outcome for my camp.

33

Trust me, you'll be getting a steal.

Most CNR holders are going to vote against this

Here here

Disagree massively.

Although we'd be lucky to see our £1+ a share, 80p+ should be nailed on.

It's the greedy/tight buyers that are the problem. Multi bns of gold in the ground and they're scatting around for 10m here 10m there.

It's time to put up or shut up. I'm glad Mellon's flushed put these foolish bids. Smart approach to be honest - if I were invested in Metal or Claibre I'd be screaming at the board to put up the 150-200 so we could acquire the project and reap the rewards. Immediate payback with shed loads of inferred?

If either if these guys DID by la India, I'd incmvest there as well because by the time it starts pouring they'd have landed their own deal of a lifetime.

Don't be mad that Condor won't drop it's pants.

This AIN'T the room you want to be spouting that sort of cr@p in, friend.

They're firing back.

Mellon's reassert himself, and some procurement director at Calibre has got their nose out of joint.

Standard stuff.

They want the project

CF you're a respected voice on this platform.

Don't indulge BMR's comments, I think he sits somewhere right in the middle of LSE and ADVFN sensibilities.

Let's stick to facts where possible, despite the frustrations.

BMR if something DOES roll through tomorrow, I'll buy you a pint (or several, depending on the news) of Timothy Taylors

In my experience the ADVFN board is unhinged, but Book does seem to have his sources.

I dare say even his sources are a bit on the moody side as well, however.

Compulsory purchase order (CPO) is a legal tool that allows certain bodies to acquire land or property without the owner's consent:

Purpose

CPOs are used to support public interest projects such as:

Building motorways

Developing town centers

Infrastructure development

Urban regeneration

Apparently we all should have asked for red telephones in our stocking this year, vs the hundreds of thousands of ozs of gold ore we're sat on.

Let's wrap this up now pls.

Maybe thats the contingency for extraction.

Frack the living daylights out of it!

We're in the water business - didn't you hear?

Can we not, with the odd amounts. It's literally trading desks sampling purchase power and float on available volume.

Can't believe the hyperbole concerning MM tricks and conspiracy theories.

Purchase volume.

Someone just dropped ca. 20k, Bobby D's commenting on the likely double bagger.

I'm still here for the triple to quad. Combination of FS and maths suggests that a quad should be achievable - just depends how long this staring contest's going to last.

Prepared to cheers you all the the merriest of Christmases.

BMR of that's true, punchy comment to throw out onto a public board, bit underhanded.

Pun genuinely not intended.

Caps clearly isn't working. Apologies for grammar.

nice to see some balanced discussions back on the board - turned into the oregon state hospital for a moment, there.

it's very sad to see 50-60p being floated, and i think the npv values floated are way too low, given the fs. i think anything below 60p would be disappointing, frankly. disregarding personal position (have said many times we need north of 40 to break even, after being here for +/- a decade), fs suggests the value of our assets should be closer to £1bn.

in what £ucking world.would jim accept less than 80p - honestly? i would literally make.more sense (for.him.specifically, to the tune if tens of millions).to subcontract mining the stuff.

i think that's why where we are. he can't be bothered to get into the mining side of it, we're navigating the sale from an absolute position of weakness (so much so that a potential suitor isn't ****d about the mill itself so have given us the burden of flogging that too! well done mc, another few mil well spent) but he has got the stones to just.....wait it out.

i think it's a shocking approach to a sale, but honestly- i think (hope) we'll be pleasantly surprised. i think 60p-£1, still. 200-250m sale price.

sounds wild, but look at bfs. jm deals in facts.

Add more!

Got to be kidding. They haven't demonstrated ANY reasoning as to why that would be a good idea.

Indicative bid prices?

None.

Timelines?

None.

Comms?

None.

Reassurances?

None.

Reason for mill provision?

None.

Contingency plan?

None.

Shareholder comprehension?

None.

No way this company is getting another penny of investment from us. Don't trust Mark or Jim any longer. I trust it'll sell, but whether it'll be a deal that'll benefit shareholders vs. Themselves is a different matter.

Confidence in BOD?

Very £ucking slim.