RE: SPD v JD - The Bottom Line20 May 2016 11:10
I don’t materially disagree Isengaard. I think, however it depends on the stock and the sector.
The whole point of a stock market is to provide funds for companies to develop, make profits and pay back the investor. Since that basic stance we all like to see some share price growth, and some of us are happy with that alone, however that is more of a gamble IMHO.
I don’t mind a young company not paying a dividend, nor one in a high growth sector, however, this is a well-established stock in a traditional sector. I also think it growth period is slowing both in terms of sales and profits. So we essentially have a slowing company issuing profits warnings, and still not paying a dividend.
I appreciate at the moment the share price is subdued, in part, due to bad press, which may present an opportunity, but if I was to take a punt on it, I would want the security of a dividend as well.
I worry about Mike Ashley getting caught up in personal battles and ego tripping instead of sorting this stock out. It needs his teams attention instead of fighting petty corporate battles with minor companies and squabbling with MP’s. That is a real risk to this stock.