Member Info for Stupmy

"unless you've got some alt way of buying and selling"

It's called SETS KS, there is no MM in the middle.

Sorry was meant to read

You've undergone a green transition. Ed Milliband would be proud of you IG

Boom!!

You've undergone a transition. I wanted so much to stay the distance with you IG, but I simply don't have the stomach for it.

Boom! You're not disapointing IG. Fabulous.

"Given the volume, level 2 tick up and sentiment, I think it closes around 35p before lift off tomorrow."

What utter nonsense IG. As I say, looking forward to hearing a lot more and bearing in mind this is day one and you're on Post 10, it seems likely I'll get my wish

"Taken a position. This was the day I was waiting for."

Are you saying, you were excited about today, because you had decided to register for LSE chat services today and it's something you'd been waiting for on the sidelines for a while?

I'm certainly looking forward to some more fabulous investment advice from you. Boom!

So it gets tricky to interpret the declared short position, as reducing the long side of the equation, could theoretically show up as an increased short where the data you're looking at describes net declared shorts. I'd assume (quite possibly naively) that we would more likely see an extension of the long side now that could make it appear that net shorts are reducing. In that scenario there would be no squeeze and the lack of squeeze would not necessarily be due to an orderly reduction of the real short?

PC, I guess that comes back to the declared shorts being net positions? So they could be substantial but wouldn't show up unless they exceeded the long side of the equation? Is that reasonable?

I thought you were talking about share repurchase programs, sorry

"company needs to get some contracts won, purchase some shares"

Coco, what's it going to purchase shares with, fairydust?

And so it continues. Be great when the price settles down and my sea of green disappears

Wondered about that NF, saw that smack down and recovery and have been out waiting for 245/246 or lower. Obviously, most don't believe that could happen. Sounds like you of a similar mind?

Aim, you owe me a glass of wine, scaring me out of my positions with your reptitive talk of 19p

My head's spinning Monkeypoo, you have 29, PJ's has 28 and Aim scared the living daylights out of me with 19.

I need a glass of wine.

Aim said it was going to defo drop to 19p so I sold everything at 22p and crystalised my losses. Now it's on it's way back up. You couldn't make it up!!

A close above 25 would be a good sign LW. Laughed at your post.

Filtering folk over the last 2 trading days has been like whack a mole, it's endless

You're not sounding less like a loony Dm1. Are you heavily exposed to WG shares from a higher price?

Dealmaker1, I've just had a look at your posting history and I have to say it makes me think that you might be a loony. You joined LSE chat on Feb 5th this year and have been frantically posting ever since.

Tell us a little about what shares you hold and why? Or explain your sudden appearance and why you're so evangelical in your posts?

Dealmaker1, do you have evidence for this statement?

"3. Once a fraud, always a fraud...this company did fraudulent accounts to investors again and again "