RE: Revenues16 Jul 2018 12:01
Brassneck,
YOU were posting about 'revenues', the message stream and subject is 'revenues', isn't it?. They missed on the original revenue expectations.
Looking at your expectations of $260-$270m (post 2nd Feb) and $90m for Q1 (post 5th Jul), how did they perform against your own expectations?
If revenues or cash were higher then you would be shouting about those rather than eps, wouldn't you?
It is good to see those high expectations now becoming more realistic.
A miss is a miss, as far I'm concerned.