RE: VCP revisited13 Mar 2019 12:19
Bravedog,
My view is that the VCP was created as a set of golden handcuffs and the targets were so structured to ensure a payout for loyalty to the cause, not as real incentive to real growth in Shareholder value.
On the matter of the methodology for valuing the options as an average sp over the thirty days subsequent to AGM, I have no issues with that aspect of the deal at all.
This is because the sp is irrelevant to the triggering of the nil cost options which are clearly geared to preset market caps, year on year, with year 0 having a completely fictitious market cap fixed @ $300m
The actual market cap @ 31/12/2016 was £1.29 * 229.4m 1.233 (xr @31/12/2016) = $365m.
So right from the get go the Executive Board and 'other key drivers' were already onto a winner!
The minimum hurdle market caps @ 8% compound are; year 1 - $324m, year 2 - $350m, year 3 - $378m,year 4 - $408m, year 5 $ 441m.
Nice work if you can get it.
Better still they get the chance to rework it as circumstances change.
The VCP participants are already in 'the pound seats' for doing nothing but towing the Party line.
The real question has to be about what they've signed up to. What is the real plan?
I don't know, but I believe the VCP plays a key role.
Footnote : Lunchtime market cap is c.a. $750m....year 5 VCP target is $686m.