Member Info for Strangy83

Very interesting video about tidal energy.
https://youtu.be/CIYA6Jwwp4s

The late 2021 CFD allocation will be very interesting...

I think it is impressive with regards to 2gw back to grid. Would personally have given plenty more ways in the video of what 2gw really looks like.
I would have also tried to equate it to each day or week Meygen can provide the following....

I agree with that but it comes down whether fair or not to politics. Plain and simple with agendas.

There may be plans for rerouting the sub coal plastic or another way to reduce the carbon foot print.

The issues still remain which are that via this or other project waste to landfill needs to be reduced across most countries.

Food for thought and lots of potential scenarios.

I would be asking.
What is the alternative for more energy?

I don't think or assume the WG can put a timeframe in place given the work and time SAE have put in to convert.

As I have said before they can sit on it for quite sometime. If the rug is pulled from them then if it was my project and money then I would find an alternative destination and location for another conversion project to sub-coal.

The reason for that is???

As per previous post.
I agree that this should not be an issue.
I also think and it is my opinion.
That if the call in was rejected and no SUP going fort then a pre plan will already be in place for a SUP like project somewhere else.
The stars are staggering for coal at the moment globally hence the need to reduce and convert with a plan to get to zero.
I have commented a few times on the Asia area now wanting to go sub-coal or similar.
It is not a case of if but when.
Also ref call in and a any rejection. This will cause shockwaves and will put SAE in a position where they will not only convert somewhere else but will leave the plant and decommission as they see fit.

I am not aware of any pending or legal requirement that must be followed with regards to commissioning timelines when you may have actively looked at converting, hence Uskmouth would then stay as building awaiting decommissioning.

We are all not experts on what the outcomes may be to this saga.

We are however getting educated on a daily basis.

I think for every well researched person on this board who thinks call in will be rejected there is also the opposite.

When push comes to shove it really boils down to politics and agendas. Simple as that.

People may want to argue either side but that is the truth of the outcome here.

Leeds bradford airport. Gets the green light when really if you weigh it up probably should not have been.
Other projects fall either side of this and it all depends who and what motives the politics are driving at the time and will it get votes.

Not the right way I know, but reality.

I as most will know want SUP to happen but I am not deluded or wear rose tinted glasses.

The bigger picture with SAE in my opinion looks good

We shall see.

Silent.
Very valid point.
I see it slightly differently and remain optimistic, however I also feel that it can quite easily go as you have indicated. Prior to that point of any full rejection SAE will require a plan to either develop elsewhere or not at all.

I personally think they will do it somewhere else.
I also think that given the areas around the USP it would be beneficial to the community. Yes initially there is the Environmental impact. This will need to be managed. However there will be a greater requirement for energy and this must come from somewhere.

Very valid and constructive points made.

Ta.

GLA

So oldbutnowisa.
You are saying that the call in outcome based upon your knowledge will be September this year??

I cannot see that and would expect an earlier decision.

I do however agree with the fact that also this is not the perfect renewable tech it will do what is required for the area and that is where the weighting is.

If the elections go ahead as planned with no issues then I would assume a decision may be available May to June.

We shall see.

GLA

Hob nobs..

@Larsh.
Yes aware of that and it was part of the GFG Plan for greener steel.

In South Wales there is as a you say a requirement for energy intensive steel. This as I said so many times is pivotal to the UK, where the industry is there for supporting all infrastructure project in the coming years.

Green steel by the way also includes hydrogen and CC.

It is again being discussed about how the UK will meet its massive EV and electrics energy requirement in the coming
years.
Having done some more reading today at some point the government must surely jump into Tidal in a.big way given that it will allow known energy at known times due to where the turbine are located.

I hope that this is with Meygen or other projects that SAE are undertaking in China, France and Japan.

Time will tell.

GLA.

I think some inappropriate threads have been taken down.
Anyway...
Let us see what today holds in the SAE saga.

GLA

Hopefully today is a positive for going forward.
I would assume that the call in will be resolved after May elections.

I have my own opinions on why I think it should happen.

1. Invested

2. Coal fired power stations X plenty for mothballing and converting

3. Tidal will only get better and SAE are a world leader in this

4 The UK governments will at some point see some sense to get to Net zero in the timescales.

Said it many times. This is not just a quick fix. It is a journey to zero.

As per news recently many people just do not want to change or understand the need for change.

So we all have a part to play and my unwavering opinion is that SUP will happen here or someone else, that my friends is a certainty.

Landfill reduction for energy increase is a temporary trade off to get to zero.

I think the olive branch did not work.

You have just embarrassed yourself?
You have actually without stating it in black and white
Said you are a deramper and opportunist.
I did give you some leeway. However your first few posts on this BB.were about advice for buying.
Then you got nasty when the call in was known.

You have now said in black and white that you sold and then bought back in?

You have said for some time that this could be the end for SAE but buy shares at 7p which to me (with morals and conviction)
Shows that you are actually a very odd person.
Do you actually think that this BB and your posts for deramping actually have an effect on the SP?
Even you cannot be that foolish.

As I have said (sorry another typo) all along time will tell with the likes of you and today will be the day that the penny drops with people who are on or visit this bulletin board in that they understand the person or persons you really are...bonfire or not.

GLA Strangy

PS Eric.
Unfiltered for fun as you are an unamusing person who I like to disagree with.
No morals. No thoughts. No investment.

@eric.
After all your posts recently and especially today I find that your insults about me are unfounded.

You are actually making yourself sound rather childish and lacking in the area of actual knowledge.
When the chips are down and there is positive news you lash out.

You siad loads but can't spell.
You cannot explain your own position.
You seem to push like mad when the price drops.

In other words you are a ......ah ah.

Ditto Welsh.
Well stated.

Dummy out Eric
Go and deramp somewhere else.
Child.