Member Info for Stocktaker01

Genuine question. Although you are more subtle the deramping uses much the same sources. Perhaps he / she is looking at your posts and regurgitating on twitter without the covertness.

Ibug are you munch on Twitter?

my feeling is that EA have probably been on a go slow on run up to election. Now that's out of the way we should get the green light

They have the cash when they are flowing the 1000bopd . And yes they will get it done. Though mistakes were made they learnt a lot at BB

Now being flipped below price paid? FFS Communication as to wtf is going on here is all that is needed

96hr flow period is not what I would call an EWT and why draw attention to what happened in 2016 when it's been under EWT for over a year this time round

No EWT 2016. EWT started 2018.... and it s still going

"EWT operations are expected to start in early December, once the rig has left the site"

oh dear. you guys stood outside are you? please

Well said CS

yeah i'm sure the gas field they were paid to take is a blockbuster. lol

angs board should be in court, stringing PIs along for the ride wrt the Brockham test that never was and they knew was never gonna be long before they announced it. Criminal, and the market knows it. Be surprised if they're still operating in 18 months

it's good news but we need the oil first ;-)

Doubt it. a tweet is all we need atm. Unless it a Tr1 that is.

Very professional set-up. It's some bluff if we ain't gonna be flowing. I can actually see "initial" figures being astronomical ^1500, even ^ 2000., but we need to consider the optimised / sustainable figure will likely be considerably lower. Between the 2 wells 1000-1200 bopd sustainable will do very nicely. As time goes on expect the trolls to be using the tanker count to deramp, but bear in mind their will be a lot of short production runs and shut-ins initially . cant see them fully opening up the taps this side of Xmas. GLA.

Agree. I find it hard to believe they will shift 26m over the last few days including forward selling. Literally every sizable sell would need to be attributed to the placing and with YA and Tellurian (whom I think have actually shifted their first £3m) about - doubt that's the case. Even then think they'd have some to go today. Sticky fingered II hopefully. We could do with a big name to get this moving!

Rich I feel you. Its evident that SS is hell bent on making a success of UKOG, and that has to start with HH. This has been at the short term disadvantage to the shareholders. However, I do feel he will be more than vindicated for all his dilutive measures if we get sustainable flows at the predicted rates or better as it is that which has increased UKOGs Holding for 20% to 86%. Of course if it dribbles I sadly think UKOG will go the way of ANGS.. whom somehow are still operating. Fair to say we have a lot riding on this test.

I’ll feeL better when we know who it is. The placing has handed the II 3.35% so we should get a tr1. The shares were due to market on or around 5/12 (today)

if they were interested in developing would be a good reason to get an inside track on HH.... perhaps

talking of IGAS, 2m placing.. mmmmm? Second to Perenco for UK onshore. bought neighbouring licence. Why wouldn't they want in to HH?