Member Info for stockdale

dealer55, when they come out with disingenuous rubbish like TrickyDicky's post they can be believed by some who sell or don't buy. That damages other investors as the SP falls.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results newto.

And you know all about it then newto?

'For some reason'. Hmmm ....

I really can not understand the idiocy of those wanting to push down the price of EUA. It's already just at 2.7p. Any lower would only be because the company had failed dramatically. Who would be buying in then? That's if they're pushing for a lower price and not just deranged keyboard warriors.

Higher is much more likely with even a small fraction of the valuation of the PGM metals available to EUA. Also because of the expertise they now have on the Board and the ability to sell one mine to easily fund the other mine and control the SP.

Of course the derampers could be people employed to push the price down to allow their employers to buy in cheaply because they know the value of this company. Who knows who those people are? Big business? Big Russian business?

Suspension is just one of the possibilities. With the new non execs now on board I expect the sale of one mine and retention if the other more likely. Just more likely only. That would provide funding for the remaining mine plus a special dividend. All we do know is the probability of failure is receding rapidly now.

He keeps saying that. We generally ignore now. No calculation involved. Just an assumption based on prejudice.

Thanks trading. The proximity surprised me as one is in Russia and the other in Finland and distances are large in that part of the World.

Don't think this has been brought up before. Have others noticed the proximity of the Monchentundra mine to the Boliden mine at Kivitsa in Finland? They are only about 30kms apart. One's in Russia and the other in Finland but only 30kms apart. Maybe the Boliden tweet on 3rd November has more significance than we (or maybe just I) thought?

Good post Ginger. They are very weird. If they don't like the company why bother? I used to be in AST. Not any more and haven't looked at the forum for weeks now. Maybe I'll have a peek ...

gmf78, A lot of "probablys" in that post. Facts mate. Just the facts. They're in the RNSes.

No takers?

Anyone else laughing? I'm not. Should I repost the points. Maybe I should and dare anyone to dispute them:

1. Negotiations have been ongoing for some months now.
2. They now have extra board members with considerable experience.
3. A sale of one of the assets would provide funding without bank involvement, other than to process the funds, for the other mine.
4. It would also provide a special dividend for shareholders which will take back control of the SP as the MMs would have to price the stock accordingly.
5. There has been virtual radio silence now for a while from the company which would indicate negotiations coming to a head after several months.

Which of those facts are you disputing newtothisgame2? Would be interesting to know.

I'm happy with sensible contrary views. But when I put forward 5 simple and plain facts and he, and others, come on and say they're wrong without any constructive reasons or argument then they are just disruptive and useless to the forum. You needed to read the RNSes to check out the facts but some will be put off by such ridiculous and incorrect posts and will be scared off from buying in or end up selling. They are the ones I will feel sorry for when the palladium and other PGM metal mine(s) is (are) sold off and we collect.

He's one of those smug people who always think they're right. So often it's misplaced confidence and normally is.

The SP is not dropping. At least not yet. If investors read your nonsense some may be scared and sell. All that palladium folks ...

Oh well. I'm off now. Well and truly off. :-)

As I said ...

Time to leave the lunatics to run the asylum? I think so.

LB28 talked sense and was useful to the board. His posts were informative. If you call that 'ramping' then you're not interested in the stock and are just here to disrupt.

Trouble is jester it's designed to scare off new investors. And it can succeed as Thursday 28th November showed us.